All
Remember the Resolver Priming draft? This thing has been kicking around
for a good solid 5 years. It stalled for a few years waiting for the
busy authors perform some updates.
Then Paul Hoffman took the reins and has done a great job getting this
ready for publication.
This starts a Work
On 4 Aug 2016, at 15:34, Wes Hardaker wrote:
"Paul Hoffman" writes:
Greetings again. There are six terms that are commonly used when we
talk about DNSSEC:
- validation and validate
- authentication and authenticate
- verification and verify
Are they defined in any RFCs that we can use for
"Paul Hoffman" writes:
> Greetings again. There are six terms that are commonly used when we
> talk about DNSSEC:
> - validation and validate
> - authentication and authenticate
> - verification and verify
> Are they defined in any RFCs that we can use for the terminology-bis
> document? As fa
Greetings again. There are six terms that are commonly used when we talk
about DNSSEC:
- validation and validate
- authentication and authenticate
- verification and verify
Are they defined in any RFCs that we can use for the terminology-bis
document? As far as I can see (but I could be blind
On 8/4/2016 1:54 AM, Ray Bellis wrote:
The one I thought was a deviation was "xmpp-client" (5222), but it turns
out that's just because my macOS /etc/services file is out of date and
still lists that as "jabber-client".
Thanks for the clarification, Ray.
Absent anyone else raising concerns, I'
Greetings again. As you can see from the diffs, we've made some progress
on new terms: root hits and trust anchor. We also made a (tentative)
decision to *not* have this document update older RFCs simply because
there were so few that would be updated, and they were so old that the
update would
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations of the IETF.
Title : DNS Terminology
Authors : Paul Hoffman
Andrew Sullivan
On 04/08/2016 05:05, John R Levine wrote:
> As of Berlin, I thought I heard that there was (still) deviations.
The one I thought was a deviation was "xmpp-client" (5222), but it turns
out that's just because my macOS /etc/services file is out of date and
still lists that as "jabber-client".
Ra
Wes,
On 08/03/2016 07:38 PM, Wes Hardaker wrote:
> Matthijs Mekking writes:
>
>> 1. In the introduction you mention there is no guidance to how long a
>> DNSKEY must be published before it can be considered accepted. Perhaps
>> there is no implicit guidance in RFC 5011, you should be able to der
