A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
RFC 7816
Title: DNS Query Name Minimisation to
Improve Privacy
Author: S. Bortzmeyer
Status: Experimental
Stream: IETF
Date: M
In message <2016030345.29993...@pallas.home.time-travellers.org>, Shane
Kerr writes:
> Maybe we just need a new RTYPE. It would be awesome if CloudFlare
> killed ANY and then gave us ANYA ("any address"). ;)
You would then need to do ANYA, A and queries or you have to
have signaling to
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 2:03 PM, Shane Kerr
wrote:
> Marek,
>
> At 2016-03-22 12:12:08 -0700
> Marek Vavruša wrote:
>
> > 2. Behavior of stubs is not explicit in the draft
> >
> > I should have stated this explicitly, the draft doesn't update behaviour
> of
> > stub resolvers. In my opinion, the
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 1:20 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> In message tb11orh1myro+ccemjwy67nyhdcrgwvhe+jm568o2cl7...@mail.gmail.com>,
> =?UTF-8?Q?Marek_Vavru=C5=A1a?= writes:
> >
> > Thanks everybody for comments! It's a lot so I'll try to rephrase and
> > answer the questions below.
> >
> > 1. N
Marek,
At 2016-03-22 12:12:08 -0700
Marek Vavruša wrote:
> 2. Behavior of stubs is not explicit in the draft
>
> I should have stated this explicitly, the draft doesn't update behaviour of
> stub resolvers. In my opinion, they should use the most basic form of DNS
> and work only over local or
In message
,
=?UTF-8?Q?Marek_Vavru=C5=A1a?= writes:
>
> Thanks everybody for comments! It's a lot so I'll try to rephrase and
> answer the questions below.
>
> 1. No signalling to client when is unavailable
>
> I didn't want to include it in the beginning but I see it has a merit.
> DNSS
Thanks everybody for comments! It's a lot so I'll try to rephrase and
answer the questions below.
1. No signalling to client when is unavailable
I didn't want to include it in the beginning but I see it has a merit.
DNSSEC has means to provide authenticated non-existence for free, so I
think
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 06:22:52PM -0700, 神明達哉 wrote:
> At Tue, 22 Mar 2016 01:15:48 +0530,
> Mukund Sivaraman wrote:
>
> > > > (1) Section 7.2.1. Authoritative Nameserver:
>
> > > I'm confused about the revised Section 7.2.1 regarding overlapping
> > > prefixes. The 07 version of the draft no
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 7:41 AM, Tony Finch wrote:
> Marek Vavruša wrote:
> >
> > there was an interest in reducing latency for address record lookups.
> > Me and Olafur wrote a draft on adding records to A answers and
> > treating them as authoritative. This fixes latency issues with NS
>
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 7:41 AM, Tony Finch wrote:
> Marek Vavruša wrote:
> >
> > there was an interest in reducing latency for address record lookups.
> > Me and Olafur wrote a draft on adding records to A answers and
> > treating them as authoritative. This fixes latency issues with NS
>
Marek Vavruša wrote:
>
> there was an interest in reducing latency for address record lookups.
> Me and Olafur wrote a draft on adding records to A answers and
> treating them as authoritative. This fixes latency issues with NS
> A/ discovery in resolvers and improves caching for clients
On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 04:04:06PM -0400,
Paul Hoffman wrote
a message of 51 lines which said:
> GOST is a "national algorithm", meaning that it is used almost
> exclusively in only one country (in this case Russia).
Five (5) domains in .fr are signed with GOST :-)
__
12 matches
Mail list logo
