[DNSOP] The DNSOP WG has adopted draft-jabley-dnsop-ordered-answers

The DNSOP WG has adopted draft-jabley-dnsop-ordered-answers (entered by Tim Wicinski) The document is available at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-jabley-dnsop-ordered-answers/ ___ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/l

[DNSOP] The DNSOP WG has adopted draft-muks-dnsop-dns-message-checksums

The DNSOP WG has adopted draft-muks-dnsop-dns-message-checksums (entered by Tim Wicinski) The document is available at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-muks-dnsop-dns-message-checksums/ ___ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/m

[DNSOP] The DNSOP WG has adopted draft-fujiwara-dnsop-nsec-aggressiveuse

The DNSOP WG has adopted draft-fujiwara-dnsop-nsec-aggressiveuse (entered by Tim Wicinski) The document is available at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-fujiwara-dnsop-nsec-aggressiveuse/ ___ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org

[DNSOP] The DNSOP WG has adopted draft-jabley-dnsop-refuse-any

The DNSOP WG has adopted draft-jabley-dnsop-refuse-any (entered by Tim Wicinski) The document is available at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-jabley-dnsop-refuse-any/ ___ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dn

[DNSOP] [QNAME minimisation] Knot resolver goes beta

More running code: the Knot DNS resolver goes beta and it implements QNAME minimisation. https://storify.com/KnotDNS/knot-dns-recursive-beta Here, resolving a 'dig -x' of an IPv6 address, you see the minimised requests (just "NS arpa" to the root, for instance) 02:36:39.673268 IP6 2400:8900::f03

Re: [DNSOP] Draft -domain-names-01

I think there’s something elided from that sentence, since, irrespective of semantics, “An outcome of that the convention …” isn’t even grammatically-correct English. - Kevin From: DNSOP [mailto:dns

Re: [DNSOP] Draft -domain-names-01

On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 7:23 AM, Edward Lewis wrote: > A while back I floated a draft across this mail list and got (what I > think) is sufficient (perhaps not the right word) feedback from the WG. I > updated the document and resubmitted. FWIW, this is the document link: > https://tool

[DNSOP] Draft -domain-names-01

A while back I floated a draft across this mail list and got (what I think) is sufficient (perhaps not the right word) feedback from the WG. I updated the document and resubmitted. FWIW, this is the document link: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-lewis-domain-names-01 I'm not even askin