-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 09/21/2015 11:50 AM, Edward Lewis wrote:
>
> I think defining -whether- name.onion is a Domain Name will make us
> re-think how Domain Names interoperate amongst protocols beyond the DN
S.
>
Agreed, but why limit to .onion? Can your example str
(Apologies for duplicates of this)
ICANN has an open Public Comment period on work relating to changing the
Root Zone's DNSSEC Public KSK. The formal Public Comment process closes
October 5, 2015. For further details, consult this URL:
https://www.icann.org/public-comments/root-ksk-2015-08-06-en
Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> If you want a nice example of a domain name which is not a DNS name,
> add in your /etc/hosts (or equivalent for your OS):
>
> 104.20.1.85
> veryveryveryveryveryveryveryveryveryveryveryveryveryveryveryveryveryveryveryveryveryveryveryveryveryveryveryveryveryveryveryver
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 02:23:15PM +0200, Giovane C. M. Moura wrote:
> > I'd be curious to know what you're seeing for the dominant "_"
> >> number in the observed TLSA queries, and whether any particular
> >> resolvers are responsible for the bulk of the "_25" queries.
>
> Now I see you meant s
On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 07:58:54PM +,
Edward Lewis wrote
a message of 145 lines which said:
> >Abstract:
> >This document states a definition of Domain Name beyond the use of
> >the term within the Domain Name System.
Very good document, IMHO, and useful. I appreciate that we have a
docum
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 12:19:26PM -0400,
Joe Abley wrote
a message of 111 lines which said:
> Whether or not we should call an onion or mdns name a "domain name"
> or something else is just a detail. I don't think agreeing on the
> answer is going to solve any of the problems that we actually
Edward Lewis wrote:
>
> It seems to me that a new layer of software is emerging between the UI and
> the stub resolver, one that will need to know where to send a name
> resolution query.
What do you mean "is emerging"? The name service switch was introduced
over 20 years ago!
There are lots of
On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 07:58:54PM +,
Edward Lewis wrote
a message of 145 lines which said:
> >Name:draft-lewis-domain-names
> >Revision:00
If you want a nice example of a domain name which is not a DNS name,
add in your /etc/hosts (or equivalent for your OS):
104.20.
Your example has some problems for me. Problems which I guess your
question was designed to draw out.
Firstly, *some* tor active clients operate by using bump-in-the-stack
methods based or analogous to SOCKS. So, there is an API which intervenes
on the normal operations and tunnels, and then its
On 9/18/15, 12:51, "DNSOP on behalf of Jim Reid" wrote:
>
>On 18 Sep 2015, at 17:19, Joe Abley wrote:
>
>> Whether or not we should call an onion or mdns name a "domain name" or
>>something else is just a detail. I don't think agreeing on the answer is
>>going to solve any of the problems that w
> I'd be curious to know what you're seeing for the dominant "_"
>> number in the observed TLSA queries, and whether any particular
>> resolvers are responsible for the bulk of the "_25" queries.
In the previous e-mail I sent the client's source ports counts, in
addition to the counts per IP.
No
Paul,
- "Further, some terms that
are defined in early DNS RFCs now have definitions that are generally
agreed to, but that are different from the original definitions.
Therefore, the authors intend to follow this document with a
substantial revision in the not-distant future. That revisi
On 18/09/2015 21:00, Tim WIcinski wrote:
On 9/16/15 4:55 AM, Benoit Claise wrote:
From the shepherd writeup:
"One issue raised by the Working Group was that such a list of
definitions would be best served with some sort of Index.
The authors and the Document Shepherd agree, but feel it would
13 matches
Mail list logo
