Terry Manderson has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-terminology-04: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please r
Greetings. I have reviewed the latest version of this document and think
that it ready for publication as an Informational RFC. It covers more of
the relevant related topics than the draft that the WG adopted, and is
clearer in many places. I'm not an implementer so I can't say whether or
not i
It would be helpful if the authors could explain why the REFUSED response is
being used here. Realizing that the current version of the document is
intended to document existing practice, nevertheless, strongly recommending the
use of REFUSED here is a bad idea, as can be seen from the advice
Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-terminology-04: Yes
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to http
I have read the draft. I am collecting information carried in EDNS0
client_subnet and have been running modified authoritative state
server-side in order to tickle it out, and I am happy with what I see. It
ain't perfect but its pretty good.
I like that the draft is reasonably clear about the know
Alvaro Retana has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-terminology-04: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please ref
Hi Eric,
Thanks for your review. Some remarks in line.
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 02:28:56PM -0700, Eric Brunner-Williams wrote:
>
> IMO, nothing is gained, and something may be lost, by suggesting that the
> DNS begins, and ends, with the IANA published zone.
I don't believe the document suggest
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 04:27:04PM +0200, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
>
> * sloppy terminology between "domain name" and "DNS name". "DNS name"
> does not seem to be defined, sometimes it is synonymous of domain
> name, sometimes it is not.
If we define DNS names as "domain names that are int
Benoit Claise has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-terminology-04: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please ref
