this is "selling past the close", an error we are all here oft guilty
of, but here i go anyway:
Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> IMO There is just an ambiguity in the RFCs, and I think it should be
> fixed.
yes. fundamentally, rrset ordering within answer sections needs
clarification. noone disagrees.
>
On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 07:45:09AM +1000, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> RFC 1034 says to add to the answer. Not added to a list that will
> then be compiled into a answer with possible reordering once all
> the records have been collected.
But as I already pointed out upthread, Mark, "add" does not me
