> On Aug 10, 2015, at 3:54 PM, Darcy Kevin (FCA)
> wrote:
>
> In retrospect, the definition of the “http” and “https” schemes (i.e. RFC
> 7230) should have probably enumerated clearly which name registries were
> acceptable for those schemes,
I generally try to avoid enumerating things that a
Hi Mark,
> > > why do you call a section a "set"?
> >
> > Because it isn't stated anywhere that they're not just a bag of
> > things that are added to, and `added' isn't `append'? It may seem
> > pedantic, but it has helped allow different interpretations to
> > spread over the years.
>
> RFC 103
