In message
, Shumon Huque writes:
>
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 2:53 PM, =E7=A5=9E=E6=98=8E=E9=81=94=E5=93=89 e...@wide.ad.jp> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 2:20 AM, wrote:
> > [...]
> > In Introduction it states:
> >
> >While negative (non-existence) information of DNS caching mechan
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 2:53 PM, 神明達哉 wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 2:20 AM, wrote:
> [...]
> In Introduction it states:
>
>While negative (non-existence) information of DNS caching mechanism
>has been known as DNS negative cache [RFC2308], it requires exact
>matching in most case
Hi all,
I have a few comments on the latest draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-terminology
(-03). There will be more; I'm part way through a review.
Thanks,
Casey
1. (stylistic) There are a number of definitions that quote terminology and
then parenthetically state "quoted from". It seems more intuitive,
pr
On 7/9/15, 11:56 AM, "Evan Hunt" wrote:
>Valid point. When the NTA for a name expires, the cached data at and
>below that name can also be discarded, so TTLs aren't a major concern
>when the cache and the validator are coresident,
Yeah, in my experience when we remove a NTA we do a cache flush fo
The IESG has approved the following document:
- 'Definition and Use of DNSSEC Negative Trust Anchors'
(draft-ietf-dnsop-negative-trust-anchors-10.txt) as Informational RFC
This document is the product of the Domain Name System Operations Working
Group.
The IESG contact persons are Benoit Claise
