-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 07/09/2015 12:53 PM, Alain Durand wrote:
>
I don't think I can make it to Prague,
> Here is a short list:
>
> - RFC6761 does not say anything wrt to coordination between IETF and I
CANN
> on this topic.
>
How did the RFC6761 reservations happ
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 07/08/2015 02:33 PM, Edward Lewis wrote:
>
> But I keep coming to this, decidedly non-engineering, question: What
> if someone uses RFC 6761 to get an offensive name registered as a
> special-use domain name?
>
TL;DR: you cannot avoid subjecti
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 07/08/2015 08:36 AM, Suzanne Woolf wrote:
>
> It further seems to me that an attempt to list names that are
> currently in the public root zone or might someday be in the public
> root zone has a high risk of being simply backwards if the purpose
On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 11:29:11AM -0400, Olafur Gudmundsson wrote:
> Strictly speaking the minimum time needed for a Negative Trust anchor is
> something like
> Domain_Operator_reaction_time + Parent_reaction_time + Parent DS TTL +
> DNSKEY TTL
Valid point. When the NTA for a name expires, the ca
On 7/7/15, 8:28 PM, "DNSOP on behalf of hellekin" wrote:
>In my opinion, what we need is already there, and is called RFC6761.
>Now I'm all ears for what needs to be done to enhance RFC6761 process.
Here is a short list:
- RFC6761 does not say anything wrt to coordination between IETF and ICA
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 9:23 AM, Suzanne Woolf
wrote:
> (No hats, and no strong feelings-- a minor point.)
>
> On Jul 8, 2015, at 11:11 PM, Evan Hunt wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 09:50:09PM -0400, Warren Kumari wrote:
> >> Less flippantly, it is in this email:
> >> https://www.ietf.org/ma
(No hats, and no strong feelings-- a minor point.)
On Jul 8, 2015, at 11:11 PM, Evan Hunt wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 09:50:09PM -0400, Warren Kumari wrote:
>> Less flippantly, it is in this email:
>> https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/current/msg13004.html I
>> don't think that w
Stephen Farrell has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-negative-trust-anchors-10: Yes
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please ref
Hi, thanks for the response. Comments inline--I've deleted text that
doesn't seem to require further discussion.
Ben.
On 8 Jul 2015, at 21:59, Warren Kumari wrote:
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 2:08 PM, Ben Campbell wrote:
Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop
David Conrad writes:
>
> In the past, ISO-3166/MA maintained a color-coded "decoding table" that
> clearly identified the "user assigned" 2-letter ISO codes. However, for
> reasons that I'm sure made sense to someone, they stopped publishing the
> decoding table (http://www.iso.org/iso/iso-
Warren Kumari writes:
>
> This number comes from Evan :-)
>
> Less flippantly, it is in this email:
> https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/current/msg13004.html I
> don't think that we have a really good motivation for a week, other
> than that is feels sort of like a good,
11 matches
Mail list logo
