On May 28, 2015, at 11:17 AM, Suzanne Woolf wrote:
> (no hats, as I haven't discussed with my co-chair and AD.)
>
> On May 27, 2015, at 3:22 PM, Lyman Chapin wrote:
>
>> We don't know each other, but if I may assume that you work for Uniregistry
>> (apologies if I'm jumping to the wrong concl
In message <7fbf3d8b-e340-4540-a8b4-4786fb3e3...@gmail.com>, Suzanne Woolf writ
es:
> (no hats, as I haven't discussed with my co-chair and AD.)
>
> On May 27, 2015, at 3:22 PM, Lyman Chapin wrote:
>
> > We don't know each other, but if I may assume that you work for Uniregistry
> (apologies i
>1. Delegating home/corp/mail in the root zone would be bad.
>2. Adding home/corp/mail to the special-use name registry would be good.
I think we should do 2.
R's,
John
PS: I agree with comments that while 1 is true, it's not directly our
department.
___
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 11:17 AM, Suzanne Woolf
wrote:
> (no hats, as I haven't discussed with my co-chair and AD.)
>
> ...
> It would be helpful to me in discerning consensus to separate two
> different concepts here.
>
> 1. Delegating home/corp/mail in the root zone would be bad.
> 2. Adding ho
On 28 May 2015, at 11:17, Suzanne Woolf wrote:
> The IETF doesn't decide what goes into the root zone. ICANN does
The IETF decide what does NOT go into the root zone, while ICANN do decide what
goes into the zone.
ICANN can only "delay" their decision of adding things by "not yet" saying
"yes"
(no hats, as I haven't discussed with my co-chair and AD.)
On May 27, 2015, at 3:22 PM, Lyman Chapin wrote:
> We don't know each other, but if I may assume that you work for Uniregistry
> (apologies if I'm jumping to the wrong conclusion from the domain name in
> your email address), you have
