> On 31 Jan 2015, at 16:56, Florian Weimer wrote:
>
> If you want to make the connections full-duplex instead of
> half-duplex, you need to negotiate connection teardown at the DNS
> layer. Otherwise, the TCP connection teardown will result in loss of
> already-transmitted responses.
This is w
> Why do you think this? RFC 103[45] has client initiated shutdown.
> The client sends out x queries withe unique ids. It waits for
> responses to all of them. It then closes the connection. The
> client still has to cope with the connection being closed early.
Indeed. Please let's not go down
In message <878ugidh2g@mid.deneb.enyo.de>, Florian Weimer writes:
> * John Heidemann:
>
> > DNS over TCP/53 is *already* persistent. No *protocol* changes are
> > needed.
>
> If you want to make the connections full-duplex instead of
> half-duplex, you need to negotiate connection teardown
* John Heidemann:
> DNS over TCP/53 is *already* persistent. No *protocol* changes are
> needed.
If you want to make the connections full-duplex instead of
half-duplex, you need to negotiate connection teardown at the DNS
layer. Otherwise, the TCP connection teardown will result in loss of
alre
