Re: [DNSOP] Followup Discussion on TCP keepalive proposals

> Tim Wicinski > Tuesday, January 20, 2015 7:37 AM > ... > The chairs are wondering: > 1) if their is still have a need for such an option, and > > 2) if there is consensus on competing proposals. > > > If you see a use case for the EDNS tcp-keepalive option a

Re: [DNSOP] Protocol Action: 'Child To Parent Synchronization in DNS' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dnsop-child-syncronization-07.txt)

I wanted to thank all the folks who offered comments, edits, and text for this document. Big thanks to Joel for patiently wading through the review process and Wes for the last-minute iterations. tim On 1/20/15 10:52 AM, The IESG wrote: The IESG has approved the following document: - 'Chi

Re: [DNSOP] Followup Discussion on TCP keepalive proposals

On Jan 20, 2015, at 7:37 AM, Tim Wicinski wrote: draft-ietf-dnsop-edns-tcp-keepalive is a reasonable document, but draft-bellis-dnsop-connection-close achieves a great deal at a very low cost. If we drop draft-ietf-dnsop-edns-tcp-keepalive (which seems likely if the authors don't want to pursu

Re: [DNSOP] New version of the DNS terminology draft

Paul, As for 'DNS Servers', I think we should set aside space for 'Cache-only DNS Server' which is pervasive in all kinds of DNS document. And as in 'Zones', you mentioned 'Origin'. So, I suggest adding a paragraph to describe 'Default TTL', which is represented as $TTL in zone file. Still, '

[DNSOP] Why servers matter less than validators, was - Re: RSA/SHA-1 to >= RSA/SHA-256 ?

On Jan 16, 2015, at 14:22, Warren Kumari wrote: > I and some others disagree on the impact of this, but my view is that > if I sign a zone it is because I'd like everyone doing DNSSEC to > actually validate the answers, not just shrug and move on… DNSSEC exists to allow the receiver of data to va

[DNSOP] Protocol Action: 'Child To Parent Synchronization in DNS' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dnsop-child-syncronization-07.txt)

The IESG has approved the following document: - 'Child To Parent Synchronization in DNS' (draft-ietf-dnsop-child-syncronization-07.txt) as Proposed Standard This document is the product of the Domain Name System Operations Working Group. The IESG contact persons are Joel Jaeggli and Benoit Clai

[DNSOP] Followup Discussion on TCP keepalive proposals

All Way back, we had a draft that was adopted by the working group on TCP Keepalives (draft-ietf-dnsop-edns-tcp-keepalive). Prior to IETF91, we received an alternative proposal that was then presented (draft-bellis-dnsop-connection-close). There was some discussion during the meeting, but