On 05/27/2014 04:49 PM, Evan Hunt wrote:
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 04:08:29PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
I'm interested in why you think a flag bit is more elegant than an
option, as I agree with Nicholas that the latter is preferable.
As with any argument that resorts to "elegance", it's a matte
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 04:08:29PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> I'm interested in why you think a flag bit is more elegant than an
> option, as I agree with Nicholas that the latter is preferable.
As with any argument that resorts to "elegance", it's a matter of
taste. A single bit, which is alre
On 05/27/2014 12:29 PM, Evan Hunt wrote:
One of our operations staff made what I thought was a clever suggestion
the other day: That it would be nice, from an operational standpoint,
to have a way to encode comments into a zone so that they wouldn't get
obliterated when a dynamic zone was dumped
[ Quoting in "Re: [DNSOP] NOTE RR type for
confid..." ]
On May 27, 2014, at 1:32 PM, Miek Gieben wrote:
[ Quoting in "[DNSOP] NOTE RR type for confidenti..." ]
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-hunt-note-rr-00.txt
Interesting idea!
What happens if a server get these records and
On May 27, 2014, at 1:32 PM, Miek Gieben wrote:
> [ Quoting in "[DNSOP] NOTE RR type for confidenti..." ]
>> One of our operations staff made what I thought was a clever suggestion
>> the other day: That it would be nice, from an operational standpoint,
>> to have a way to encode comments into
[ Quoting in "[DNSOP] NOTE RR type for confidenti..." ]
One of our operations staff made what I thought was a clever suggestion
the other day: That it would be nice, from an operational standpoint,
to have a way to encode comments into a zone so that they wouldn't get
obliterated when a dynamic
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 12:57:01PM -0700, Nicholas Weaver wrote:
> Using an EDNS0 bit however, does not makes sense to me. Flag bits are
> rare and precious, while 16b option codes are not.
I was expecting this feedback, and am entirely prepared to redraft
using an EDNS option if (when?) that tur
On May 27, 2014, at 12:29 PM, Evan Hunt wrote:
> One of our operations staff made what I thought was a clever suggestion
> the other day: That it would be nice, from an operational standpoint,
> to have a way to encode comments into a zone so that they wouldn't get
> obliterated when a dynamic
One of our operations staff made what I thought was a clever suggestion
the other day: That it would be nice, from an operational standpoint,
to have a way to encode comments into a zone so that they wouldn't get
obliterated when a dynamic zone was dumped to disk, but couldn't be read
by just anyb
