On 12/18/13 2:12 AM, Andreas Schulze wrote:
Hello,
I was requested to delegate a new subzone to nameservers with private
ip addresses.
I know it's at least not what makes me happy. But are there IETF
recommendations against this?
That would help me to drop the request.
I suspect it is so
Hello,
I was requested to delegate a new subzone to nameservers with private
ip addresses.
I know it's at least not what makes me happy. But are there IETF
recommendations against this?
That would help me to drop the request.
Thanks
Andreas
___
On Dec 17, 2013, at 12:47 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 04:21:35PM +0800,
> Jianjun Ning wrote
> a message of 61 lines which said:
>
>> ;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
>> ; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; MBZ: 0005 , udp: 512
>> ;; QUESTION SECTION:
>> ;www.google.com.hk.
I just posted a new version of the DNS privacy draft,
draft-bortzmeyer-dnsop-dns-privacy-01. The most important difference
is that it is now split in two, one pure problem statement,
draft-bortzmeyer-dnsop-dns-privacy and an exploration of possible
solutions, draft-bortzmeyer-dnsop-privacy-sol. The
On 12/17/13 09:21, Jianjun Ning wrote:
> All,
> When I run the command 'dig www.google.com.hk +bufsize=768',I got this
> ;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
> ; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; MBZ: 0005 , udp: 512
Does it increase after consecutive queries?
It reminds me of this:
https://www.sidnlabs.nl/laatste-be
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 04:21:35PM +0800,
Jianjun Ning wrote
a message of 61 lines which said:
> ;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
> ; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; MBZ: 0005 , udp: 512
> ;; QUESTION SECTION:
> ;www.google.com.hk. IN A
>
> The value of field MBZ is 0x0005!!
The Google autho
All,
When I run the command 'dig www.google.com.hk +bufsize=768',I got this message,
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 22832
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 2, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1
;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; MBZ: 0005 , udp: 512
