Re: [DNSOP] Adoption of as a WG work item?

2013-02-15 Thread Paul Hoffman
Sure, looks good. I'll review drafts. --Paul Hoffman ___ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Re: [DNSOP] Adoption of as a WG work item?

2013-02-15 Thread Christopher Morrow
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 5:05 PM, Paul Ebersman wrote: > > nick> I like this and think it should be adopted as a WG doc. Am not > nick> going to volunteer for formal document review, but would be happy > nick> to run + provide feedback for this sort of code in a live > nick> environment. > > I als

Re: [DNSOP] Adoption of as a WG work item?

2013-02-15 Thread Paul Ebersman
nick> I like this and think it should be adopted as a WG doc. Am not nick> going to volunteer for formal document review, but would be happy nick> to run + provide feedback for this sort of code in a live nick> environment. I also support this being adopted as a WG document.