Re: [DNSOP] some implementation notes: binding to all IP addresses

2012-10-08 Thread JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
At Mon, 8 Oct 2012 21:53:04 +0200, bert hubert wrote: > The post is currently short on details for Solaris and Windows. If you have > clues, please share! As far as I know Windows doesn't support RFC 3542. --- JINMEI, Tatuya Internet Systems Consortium, Inc.

Re: [DNSOP] some implementation notes: binding to all IP addresses

2012-10-08 Thread Mark Andrews
In message , Paul Wouters w rites: > On Mon, 8 Oct 2012, bert hubert wrote: > > > 'automatic binding to ALL IPv4 and IPv6 addresses'. We do so using the > > setsockopt/sendmsg/recvmsg flags that allow for the capturing of the 'real' > > destination address of a packet received in 0.0.0.0 or ::. >

Re: [DNSOP] [dane] FYI: Verisign files patent application for way of transfering hosting on DNSSEC Domains

2012-10-08 Thread Tony Finch
On 8 Oct 2012, at 16:08, SM wrote: > > Does this affect draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc4641bis (currently in the RFC Editor > queue)? It's section on change-of-operator was added in revision -03 dated July 2010. Sadly it is buggy. http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc4641bis-03#section-4.3.5

[DNSOP] how not to do an operator transfer, was Re: [dane] FYI: Verisign files patent application for way of transfering hosting on DNSSEC Domains

2012-10-08 Thread Tony Finch
On 8 Oct 2012, at 15:35, Ray Bellis wrote: > > That procedure is incorrect: it is missing a wait step between updating the DS and DNSKEY RRsets and updating the NS RRsets. A validator might fetch data from the new o

Re: [DNSOP] some implementation notes: binding to all IP addresses

2012-10-08 Thread Paul Wouters
On Mon, 8 Oct 2012, bert hubert wrote: 'automatic binding to ALL IPv4 and IPv6 addresses'. We do so using the setsockopt/sendmsg/recvmsg flags that allow for the capturing of the 'real' destination address of a packet received in 0.0.0.0 or ::. In attempting to implement this, we found missing

[DNSOP] some implementation notes: binding to all IP addresses

2012-10-08 Thread bert hubert
Hi, This message is slightly offtopic, but this is the best list for reaching all DNS implementors I think. And I need your help! After ten years of nagging, PowerDNS Authoritative Server implemented 'automatic binding to ALL IPv4 and IPv6 addresses'. We do so using the setsockopt/sendmsg/recvms

Re: [DNSOP] [dane] FYI: Verisign files patent application for way of transfering hosting on DNSSEC Domains

2012-10-08 Thread SM
At 06:58 08-10-2012, Tony Finch wrote: Prior art: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-koch-dnsop-dnssec-operator-change-01 Does this affect draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc4641bis (currently in the RFC Editor queue)? Regards, -sm ___ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@i

Re: [DNSOP] [dane] FYI: Verisign files patent application for way of transfering hosting on DNSSEC Domains

2012-10-08 Thread Ray Bellis
On 8 Oct 2012, at 15:13, Ted Lemon mailto:ted.le...@nominum.com>> wrote: On Oct 8, 2012, at 9:58 AM, Tony Finch mailto:d...@dotat.at>> wrote: Prior art: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-koch-dnsop-dnssec-operator-change-01 Interesting timing: the Verisign patent was filed two weeks after this

Re: [DNSOP] [dane] FYI: Verisign files patent application for way of transfering hosting on DNSSEC Domains

2012-10-08 Thread Ted Lemon
On Oct 8, 2012, at 9:58 AM, Tony Finch wrote: > Prior art: > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-koch-dnsop-dnssec-operator-change-01 Interesting timing: the Verisign patent was filed two weeks after this draft was published. ___ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP

Re: [DNSOP] [dane] FYI: Verisign files patent application for way of transfering hosting on DNSSEC Domains

2012-10-08 Thread Tony Finch
> On Fri, 5 Oct 2012, John Gilmore wrote: > > > [Sounds like somebody should tell the Patent Office that this > > "invention" is obvious to anyone skilled in the field, before > > those lovely monopolists at Verisign find themselves with yet > > another government-granted monopoly.] > > > > http://