Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-dps-framework-06.txt

2012-02-29 Thread Fredrik Ljunggren
Friends, A new version of the DNSSEC Policy & Practice Statement Framework have been submitted. This version includes edits from a second round of nits-readings following the WGLC. Although the diff is fairly long, there should be no substantial changes from the last version. Anyone intereste

[DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-dps-framework-06.txt

2012-02-29 Thread internet-drafts
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations Working Group of the IETF. Title : DNSSEC Policy & Practice Statement Framework Author(s) : Fredrik Ljunggren

Re: [DNSOP] Batch Multiple Query Packet

2012-02-29 Thread Phil Regnauld
Shane Kerr (shane) writes: > > 1. Send query with the magic EDNS to a server. > 2. If the response is in the new format, then remember that. > 3. Subsequent queries go to a different port, using a new format. Would it be nuts to sugggest that the different port could be specified

[DNSOP] Knot DNS v1.0.0 released

2012-02-29 Thread Ondřej Surý
Hi all, I wouldn't normally crosspost this, but since it's our 1.0.0 version... So sorry for duplicates and please download, enjoy, awe, test and report bugs :). Thanks, Ondrej Begin forwarded message: > From: Lubos Slovak > Subject: [knot-dns-users] Knot DNS v1.0.0 released! > Date: 29. úno

Re: [DNSOP] Batch Multiple Query Packet

2012-02-29 Thread John Levine
>The main (only?) advantage of doing it with EDNS is that you can work >with existing name servers. It means adding more logic to our already >fabulously complicated resolvers to get full benefit, but nobody ever >said DNS was easy. If you're adding logic to servers and clients, why couldn't some

Re: [DNSOP] Batch Multiple Query Packet

2012-02-29 Thread Ray Bellis
On 28 Feb 2012, at 18:40, Paul Vixie wrote: if the EDNS option for this just had an array of additional QTYPE, such that the real QNAME and QCLASS pertained to all of these additional questions, then i could definitely see value in this. the response's OPT option would include the list of qtypes

Re: [DNSOP] Batch Multiple Query Packet

2012-02-29 Thread Shane Kerr
Paul, On Tuesday, 2012-02-28 18:40:30 +, Paul Vixie wrote: > > > . > > I think we're missing a potential great opportunity here by thinking > > too small. > > > > Rather than mucking about with QDCOUNT and breaking old servers, why > > not just move addit