The topic discussed in draft-liman-tld-names-00 has two angles, the
application angle and the DNS angle. The "requirements" can be
different depending on which angle we are looking at. From Section
11 of RFC 2181:
"The DNS itself places only one restriction on the particular labels
that
In message <2009030621.gp12...@shinkuro.com>, Andrew Sullivan writes:
> On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 03:54:58PM -0500, Edward Lewis wrote:
>
> > knowledge of IDNs and the BiDi issue. But when I talked with some folks
> > around the ICANN circus, there was conventional wisdom that there would
>
I haven't read the draft yet, but the discussion whether numeric
labels are allowed seems to get slightly out of hand.
Anybody can use them and apparently people are. That is easily
proved but running something like:
for i in `seq 1 1 1000`; do echo $i; dig +short $i.com; done
and replac
On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 03:54:58PM -0500, Edward Lewis wrote:
> knowledge of IDNs and the BiDi issue. But when I talked with some folks
> around the ICANN circus, there was conventional wisdom that there would
> be no admission of a delegation beginning or ending with a digit to the
> root zon
At 15:13 -0500 3/6/09, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
But depending on whether you think the text I quoted is normative,
1123 may actually forbid those IDNs at the top level. Which would be
a bad thing, I think.
I'm not sure what...a bad thing would be forbidding IDNs or is a bad
thing removing the
On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 02:38:37PM -0500, Edward Lewis wrote:
> Remember that RFC 1123 was written in a historical epoch much different
> than today. No IDNs. No URLs. No thought of domain names in
> newspapers.
But depending on whether you think the text I quoted is normative,
1123 may actu
At 14:08 -0500 3/6/09, someone wrote:
...I think appealing to the RFC 1123 rules for this case is going to
be tricky.
Remember that RFC 1123 was written in a historical epoch much
different than today. No IDNs. No URLs. No thought of domain names
in newspapers.
The BiDi issue will prett
On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 10:56:45AM +0100, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> They cannot be "interpreted as part of a dotted-quad" if everyone
> follows RFC 1123 section 2.1 "The host SHOULD check the string
> syntactically for a dotted-decimal number before looking it up in the
> Domain Name System".
F
In message <20090306095645.ga19...@nic.fr>, Stephane Bortzmeyer writes:
> On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 11:55:39AM -0500,
> Andrew Sullivan wrote
> a message of 22 lines which said:
>
> > There's a strong technical reason to ban any numeric TLD name that
> > could be interpreted as part of a dotted
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations Working Group of
the IETF.
Title : DNSSEC Operational Practices, Version 2
Author(s) : O. Kolkman, M. Gieben
File
I just discovered that Microsoft registered tempuri.com (and .org) and
apparently promotes them for use in documentation and examples,
ignoring RFC 2606.
Actually, if you read the text at that link, it is for using in
experimental XML namespaces.
jaap
On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 11:55:39AM -0500,
Andrew Sullivan wrote
a message of 22 lines which said:
> There's a strong technical reason to ban any numeric TLD name that
> could be interpreted as part of a dotted-quad,
They cannot be "interpreted as part of a dotted-quad" if everyone
follows RF
I just discovered that Microsoft registered tempuri.com (and .org) and
apparently promotes them for use in documentation and examples,
ignoring RFC 2606.
http://www.google.com/search?q="tempuri"+site%3Amicrosoft.com
___
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
13 matches
Mail list logo
