On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 01:21:31PM -0700, David Conrad wrote:
> are easier now then they were when I had a couple of lawyers look at
> it for DNSSEC (which doesn't have encryption)) and it may or may not
Technically, this may be true - but I got into trouble over an AES-based
random generator,
> 1. no trust anchors in design, signatures seems to be loosely
> connected.
> 2. In it's ideal state it would change DNS to DNS over DNS-TXT.
> 3. Requirements on aDNS server computation power is raised.
> 4. I am not sure if labels like [...] make things more simpler.
5. I suspect having encry
2008/8/31 Joe Baptista <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> http://dnscurve.org/
>
> comments?
I already made comments on namedroppers, so I will summarize it here:
1. no trust anchors in design, signatures seems to be loosely connected.
Djb added page for TLD operators today, where he proposes signing .com
