Re: [DNSOP] WGLC: "Considerations for the use of DNS Reverse Mapping"

2008-06-05 Thread Andrew Sullivan
On Thu, Jun 05, 2008 at 12:28:13PM -0700, bill fumerola wrote: > there were several issues opened when WGLC was made, i can't find > where these were made to see if they've been addressed in the most > recent draft. this was referred to as issue 20. I didn't update the draft, because nobody (and

Re: [DNSOP] WGLC: "Considerations for the use of DNS Reverse Mapping"

2008-06-05 Thread bill fumerola
On Thu, Jun 05, 2008 at 12:04:24PM +0200, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > What happened to this draft? There have been a few comments, all of > them positive (except the one from JINMEI Tatuya) and nothing was > announced and the I-D tracker seems to indicate that the draft was not > transferred to IE

Re: [DNSOP] WGLC: "Considerations for the use of DNS Reverse Mapping"

2008-06-05 Thread Dean Anderson
Err, lets try to keep the facts straight: not all were positive. Besides JINMEI Tatuya, my evaluation was also very much a thumbs down. If this document is/was approved, I will probably file an appeal with the IESG, and a place a discrediting page on IETF-watch. If anyone wants to join me in the a

Re: [DNSOP] short term document roadmap

2008-06-05 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 06:13:44PM +0100, Peter Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 39 lines which said: > 2) draft-ietf-dnsop-as112-ops-01.txt >draft-ietf-dnsop-as112-under-attack-help-help-01.txt > >These will go to WGLC together, WGLC starting early April until 2008-04-18. >

Re: [DNSOP] WGLC: "Considerations for the use of DNS Reverse Mapping"

2008-06-05 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 04:45:00AM +0100, Peter Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 21 lines which said: > in accordance with the roadmap posted the other day, this is to initiate > a working group last call on > > "Considerations for the use of DNS Reverse Mapping" > draft