> On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 12:19:27PM +0200, Antoin Verschuren wrote:
>
> > http://seclists.org/bugtraq/2008/Jan/0270.html
> > that states that localhost entries in zones should be discouraged.
>
> if I follow this correctly, the risk is for "localhost.example.org" to enable
> anyone on the same
+1
On Apr 14, 2008, at 2:29 PM, Paul Vixie wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ("William F. Maton Sotomayor") writes:
>
>> At this point, I'd like to see the current pair of drafts move
>> forward,
>> and would cast this particular issue as the subject of some sort of
>> other document.
>
> likewise, me.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ("William F. Maton Sotomayor") writes:
> At this point, I'd like to see the current pair of drafts move forward,
> and would cast this particular issue as the subject of some sort of
> other document.
likewise, me.
--
Paul Vixie
___
On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 12:19:27PM +0200, Antoin Verschuren wrote:
> http://seclists.org/bugtraq/2008/Jan/0270.html
> that states that localhost entries in zones should be discouraged.
if I follow this correctly, the risk is for "localhost.example.org" to enable
anyone on the same host as the vic
On Mon, 14 Apr 2008, Peter Koch wrote:
> For the "AS112 for TLDs" I sense there is consensus to go to WGLC with
> maintaining
> the drafts' current focus.
At this point, I'd like to see the current pair of drafts move forward,
and would cast this particular issue as the subject of some sort of
On Fri, Apr 04, 2008 at 03:51:16PM -0700, John L. Crain wrote:
> I don't think the disease is life threatening. I keep hearing about the
> "Problem" of bogus queries to the root. It is certainly messy and ugly but
> from my perspective as an operator it is more of irritant than anything else.
>
Dear WG,
> Rob and I will coordinate with the bmwg chair on the "perf & measurement" part
> of the charter and then issue a WGLC, after which we'll enter negotiations
> with
> the AD(s) regarding deliverables and milestones.
just FYI, this is still ongoing. Nothing controversial, but since we'r
