On Fri, 9 Feb 2007, william(at)elan.net wrote:
Isn't it better to have several roots anycast and connect at every
large enough traffic exchange points (IX) so as to connect to everyone
locally that way?
How useful that approach is probably depends a lot on how the DNS
resolvers' algorithms se
On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 03:20:59PM +0100, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> I was surprised that there is apparently no formal document, either
> RFC or else, on this subject "Local copy of the root zone considered
> harmful | good". Did I miss something?
Depending on the ratio of bandwidth available
On Fri, 9 Feb 2007, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
There is a thread on the CircleID information site:
http://www.circleid.com/posts/attack_internet_root_servers/
which, in the light of this week's attack on root name servers,
suggest to keep a local copy of the root zone.
I was surprised that t
At 11:09 -0500 2/9/07, Joe Abley wrote:
Would, or should?
Would.
--
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Edward Lewis+1-571-434-5468
NeuStar
"Two years ago you said we had 5-7 years, now you are saying 3-5
On 9-Feb-2007, at 10:55, Edward Lewis wrote:
At 15:20 +0100 2/9/07, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
There is a thread on the CircleID information site:
http://www.circleid.com/posts/attack_internet_root_servers/
which, in the light of this week's attack on root name servers,
suggest to keep a loc
At 15:20 +0100 2/9/07, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
There is a thread on the CircleID information site:
http://www.circleid.com/posts/attack_internet_root_servers/
which, in the light of this week's attack on root name servers,
suggest to keep a local copy of the root zone.
To add to "what I've
There is a thread on the CircleID information site:
http://www.circleid.com/posts/attack_internet_root_servers/
which, in the light of this week's attack on root name servers,
suggest to keep a local copy of the root zone.
I was surprised that there is apparently no formal document, either
RFC o
