--On tisdag, tisdag 6 feb 2007 09.43.18 -0500 Andrew Sullivan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd like to know whether people think that is a reasonable thing to
> say. If the answer is, "No," then I'm not sure what we can say about
> reverse mappings at all.
I think the draft is a good compromise
> On Tue, 6 Feb 2007 09:43:18 -0500 Andrew wrote:
> AS> [...] In other words, the draft as written says, I think, that
> AS> administrator of site A is perfectly entitled to make decisions about
> AS> site B on the basis of reverse mappings, _but_, the administrator of
> AS> site A is cautioned th
On Tue, 6 Feb 2007 09:43:18 -0500 Andrew wrote:
AS> [...] In other words, the draft as written says, I think, that
AS> administrator of site A is perfectly entitled to make decisions about
AS> site B on the basis of reverse mappings, _but_, the administrator of
AS> site A is cautioned that there a
Hi,
Thanks for your careful reading and measured comments. Thanks also
for the suggested text.
Before I deal with some of the issues you raise in your posting, I
want to request some feedback from the wider group on what is clearly
the central question in this discussion. I'd like to get a gene