. Once it
starts working if I change back to local dns server, it works fine. Any
idea what's going wrong with this patch?
Regards,
Sunil Rathod.
On Tue, Mar 16, 2021, 16:16 sunil rathod wrote:
>
>
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsm
With dnspooq patch dns resulation fails when I configure same server with
two different interfaces as below,
server 10.8.8.21@eth0
server 10.8.8.21@eth1,
If remove the dnspooq patch, resulation happen properly. Is there any
known issue with dnspooq patch?
On Tue, Mar 16, 2021, 16:16 sunil rathod
Hi All,
Any thoughts why dnsmasq is replying with REFUSE response without
forwarding the query to upstream server? Nslookup always fails with refuse
response from the external client. I have the upstream server configured on
conf file as
server=8.8.8.8@eth0
Regards,
Sunil
_
Simon.
>
>
> On 22/07/2021 18:21, sunil rathod wrote:
> > Hi All,
> > Any thoughts why dnsmasq is replying with REFUSE response without
> > forwarding the query to upstream server? Nslookup always fails with
> > refuse response from the external client. I have the upst
I m using dnsmasq 2.80
On Fri, Jul 23, 2021, 14:05 sunil rathod wrote:
> I get a warning message saying no upstream servers configured when I start
> the dnsmasq. But in dnsmasq.conf file I have configured upstream server as
> below
> server=8.8.8.8@eth0. dnsmasq is running bu
Jul 2021, at 18:21, sunil rathod wrote:
> > Hi All,
> > Any thoughts why dnsmasq is replying with REFUSE response without
> > forwarding the query to upstream server? Nslookup always fails with
> > refuse response from the external client. I have the upstream server
>
Forgot to mention that kernel has been upgraded on the system.
On Fri, Jul 23, 2021, 15:18 sunil rathod wrote:
> Hello Alex,
> Thank you for your reply. How can I figure out if it's implemented on our
> platform. I m using 2.80 version. Is there any work around for this?
>
Hello Alex,
Thank you for your reply. How can I figure out if it's implemented on our
platform. I m using 2.80 version. Is there any work around for this?
On Fri, Jul 23, 2021, 14:59 Alex Morris
wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Jul 2021, at 09:35, sunil rathod wrote:
> >
> > I get a wa
.
> Your problem now is to work out why dnsmasq is not reading your
> configuration. Note that it logs the configured servers ar start up, so
> that should help debugging.
>
> Simon.
>
> On 23 July 2021 09:35:06 GMT+01:00, sunil rathod
> wrote:
>>
>> I get
2PM +0530, sunil rathod wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 23, 2021, 17:01 Simon Kelley
> wrote:
> > > On 23 July 2021 09:35:06 GMT+01:00, sunil rathod wrote:
> > >>
> > >> I get a warning message saying no upstream servers configured when I
> > >> start the
Hi Petr,
I have used the following patches for 2.80 release along with dnspooq patch
to resolve the bugs.
Does this patch have any implications with the "SO_BINDTODEVICE" option in
sockets. In my system, when DNS replies arrive on the interface, the kernel
seems to drop these because of a mismat
11 matches
Mail list logo
