a SIGKILL rather
than a SIGTERM.
Any thoughts/impressions? Below is the (simplest) patch addressing the one
tcp_request per poll cycle.
Signed-off-by: Tijs Van Buggenhout
--
diff --git a/src/dnsmasq.c b/src/dnsmasq.c
index 256d2bc..52dda2f 100644
--- a/src/dnsmasq.c
+++ b/src/dnsmasq.c
On vrijdag 9 april 2021 17:26:42 CEST Simon Kelley wrote:
> On 09/04/2021 11:04, Tijs Van Buggenhout wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > We are using dnsmasq as part of OpenWrt for a managed VPN solution. As
> > soon as the VPN is up, all DNS requests are forwarded to an upstr
uk. IN A
;; ANSWER SECTION:
thekelleys.org.uk. 838 IN A85.119.82.65
;; Query time: 0 msec
;; SERVER: 127.0.0.2#53(127.0.0.2) (UDP)
;; WHEN: Thu Mar 14 13:44:46 CET 2024
;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 90
Regards,
Tijs Van Buggenhout
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message
Hi Elias,
I have the following in my configuration:
no-daemon
no-resolv
no-poll
server=/*ntp.axsguard.com/8.8.8.8
server=8.8.8.8
server=/gitlab.com/#
address=/#/0.0.0.0
When dnsmasq starts up, it leaves some information in the log file about DNS
configuration (the first thirty).
dnsmasq: using
Hi Simon,
I have a question about commit 6656790f in regard changes to tcp_request
function.
commit 6656790f2498f2a0b21086bc4ab47a2e38429a7c
Author: Simon Kelley
Date: Tue Jan 7 20:46:33 2025 +
Handle queries with EDNS client subnet fields better.
The call to add_edns0_config moved
) at
dnsmasq.c:1912
#3 0xdfc0 in main (argc=, argv=) at
dnsmasq.c:1289
(gdb) quit
Please consider the following patch...
Credits go to pedro0311
>From 0d87b0ac8ed525ab1eb43b753145702eba0db197 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tijs Van Buggenhout
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2025 14:42:10 +0100
