Hello,
interested in the sweet feature of ra-names, i migrated from a
radvd-based setup to dnsmasq 2.62
unfortunately, i found out that dnsmasq doesn't set the "on-link" bit
to 1 on the RA packet, like radvd does by default.
(other than that, the packets are equivalent)
this bit instructs host to
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 1:14 PM, Gui Iribarren wrote:
> Hello,
> Could this be changed, so that on-link bit is set to 1 by default? (i
> think it makes sense given dnsmasq normal use cases, and it's also the
> default in radvd)
For completeness sake, the following patch hardco
On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
> On 09/14/2012 03:39 PM, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
>>
>> I have been trying to get some (virtual) IPv6 networks working with
>> dnsmasq acting as both an dhcp6 server and a dns server. I really do not
>> care how the IP6 addresses are assigne
IIRC localise-queries is the name of the option you're looking for.
--localise-queries: Return answers to DNS queries from /etc/hosts
which depend on the interface over which the ...
You add both ips to /etc/hosts and dnsmasq selects the 'right one'
according to who is asking
On 9/18/12, K R wro
here
lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2012q1/005547.html
On 9/18/12, Gui Iribarren wrote:
> IIRC localise-queries is the name of the option you're looking for.
> --localise-queries: Return answers to DNS queries from /etc/hosts
> which depend on the interface over wh
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 7:30 PM, Lagarto wrote:
> 4324 00:09:37:0d:76:ff 192.168.101.207 *
> ff:12:34:5b:28:00:01:00:00:00:00:00:00
> 4288 00:09:37:0d:76:ff 192.168.101.205 *
> ff:12:34:5b:27:00:01:00:00:00:00:00:00
> 4252 00:09:37:0d:76:ff 192.168.101.204 *
> ff:12:34:5b:26:00:01:00:00:00:00:0
> Simon Kelley (simon@...) wrote on 7 March 2011 21:44:
> >So, can somebody set down under exactly what circumstances being able to
> >set an NS record in dnsmasq would be useful? It's clearly pretty easy to
> >add as a feature, but I'm not sure why the need.
Hello Simon,
(...resurrecting
http:
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Simon Kelley wrote:
> That looks very interesting. It's out of comfort-zone for DNS-wrangling,
> but I will cause it to be looked at by people who know more about this.
> If they think it's a valid thing to do, I'll implement enough NS record
> functionality to make
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 9:46 AM, Simon Kelley wrote:
> On 02/11/12 12:43, Gui Iribarren wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Simon Kelley > <mailto:si...@thekelleys.org.uk>> wrote:
>>
>> That looks very interesting. It's out of comfort-zone f
On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 6:48 PM, Simon Kelley wrote:
> On 01/11/12 21:58, Gui Iribarren wrote:
>
>> What do you think? would that be an argument for implementing this into
>> dnsmasq?
>> (or maybe there's another way to do this i'm overlooking)
>> (dnsmasq
Simon,
sorry for not giving a single feedback on this until now,
december wasn't my geekiest month :)
but i'm getting back on this at the moment and hope to report results soon
Cheers and hope it's looking like a great 2013 already!
Gui
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 5:53 PM, Simon Kelley wrote:
> On
Hello again,
i'm trying to use dnsmasq to send router advertisements over a
ipv6-only tinc network.
with this minimal config
port=0
dhcp-range=2a00:1508:1:f000::, 64, ra-only
enable-ra
log-dhcp
and this interface
8: tinc6: mtu 1280 qdisc pfifo_fast
state UNKNOWN qlen 1000
link/ether de:8e:ae
On 01/11/2013 10:22 AM, Gui Iribarren wrote:
> Simon,
> sorry for not giving a single feedback on this until now,
> december wasn't my geekiest month :)
> but i'm getting back on this at the moment and hope to report results soon
Simon, I know I have praised you much alre
Hello Simon!
so, i'm trying to do whacky stuff with dnsmasq v2.66-rc2 on openwrt
basically, i have two interfaces that have different ips but on the same
netmask, and i want dnsmasq to offer dhcpv4 / RA on only one of them.
yet, as dnsmasq config is thought out like "okay, here, have these
rang
On 10/22/2013 05:45 PM, Simon Kelley wrote:
On 21/10/13 20:31, Gui Iribarren wrote:
Hello Simon!
My hunch is that this is something to do with ARP.
indeed! i'm sorry i didn't provide tcpdumps
you're right, instead of the expected DHCPOFFER, all i got on the client
w
On 10/22/2013 05:45 PM, Simon Kelley wrote:
On 21/10/13 20:31, Gui Iribarren wrote:
Hello Simon!
My hunch is that this is something to do with ARP.
indeed! i'm sorry i didn't provide tcpdumps
you're right, instead of the expected DHCPOFFER, all i got on the client
w
Hello once again Simon,
we are giving one more iteration to this Libre-Mesh[0] idea, this
weekend at a HackMeeting[1] near Bilbao
i already described a bit of the "interesting" setup generated by the
firmware in my last email.
To make the mesh as distributed / resilient as possible, there's
On 11/02/2013 09:47 PM, Weedy wrote:
On 2 Nov 2013 16:31, "Gui Iribarren" mailto:g...@altermundi.net>> wrote:
> Problem is, there's no way to update dnsmasq internal database from
outside (i.e. when alfred gets new info from another node); SIGHUP will
not make dnsmas
Hello,
so, we started suffering frequent, periodic disconnects on clients since
upgrading dnsmasq 2.62 -> 2.66
tracking down the issue, it came down to a network-manager bug while
maintaining the RDNSS list, where an unhandled expiring RDNSS lifetime
results in a full reconnection
problem i
On 11/04/2013 03:49 PM, Simon Kelley wrote:
On 02/11/13 20:30, Gui Iribarren wrote:
Calling "init" after startup would be "interesting" to implement. All
the other script calls apart from "init", are handled by a separate
process. This is for two reasons: 1) It
On 10/22/2013 08:20 PM, Simon Kelley wrote:
On 22/10/13 17:17, Gui Iribarren wrote:
On 10/22/2013 05:45 PM, Simon Kelley wrote:
On 21/10/13 20:31, Gui Iribarren wrote:
Hello Simon!
Then, do you think there's any chance of getting that arp trick point to
'anygw'?
Yes, d
On 01/30/2014 11:40 AM, Dave Taht wrote:>>> ?
and then there's splitting dns... where I might want nuc.hm.armory.com
s available to the outside universe. somehow.
Have you looked at the dnsmasq auth stuff for this?
head, hurting.
hope a real-life example helps :)
$ cat /etc/dnsmasq.c
On 31/07/14 13:23, Simon Kelley wrote:
> On 30/07/14 07:35, Joel Krauska wrote:
>> I've seen a few interesting proposals for running dnsmasq in a redundant
>> way.
>> (running active/passive and trying to keep leases updated atomically, eg.
>> using a db)
>>
>> But I haven't seen an actual implemen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
26/10/14 15:54, Moritz Warning:
> hi,
>
> I get confused a bit with slaac, ra-names etc..
hehe... it took me some time to get my head around it too :)
ra-names it's just a "feature" that you add on top of slaac or ra-stateless
both slaac and ra-s
Hey Simon,
preparing here a new release of libremesh.org firmware,
i was revising our dnsmasq conf, and gladly found out that this workaround:
http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2013q4/007687.html
is no longer needed!
apparently, dnsmasq now handles this "interesting" setup co
25 matches
Mail list logo
