[Dnsmasq-discuss] dnsmasq 2.90 reply truncated

2024-03-11 Thread Adam Pribyl
. The general question would be - what is the correct DNS setup then? I probably need to change the bind config, as I do not want to fix every dnsmasq "client" in the network. Thanks Adam Pribyl ___ Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list Dnsmasq-discus

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] dnsmasq 2.90 reply truncated

2024-03-12 Thread Adam Pribyl
ply is truncated" for this forwarded query. I do not think the problem is the Windows client, because from the time I downgraded the dnsmasq on Fedora to 2.89, I did not get any "reply is truncated" dnsmasq log message anymore. I can not judge if client should do anything else i

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] dnsmasq 2.90 reply truncated

2024-03-18 Thread Adam Pribyl
used in dnsmasq before 2.90 version. Adam Pribyl On Tue, 12 Mar 2024, Adam Pribyl wrote: In this case the query is from Windows 10 machine->dnsmasq server on Fedora 38 forwards to -> bind on debian. The result on Windows nslookup Server: UnKnown Address: 192.168.34.1 *** UnKnown

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] dnsmasq 2.90 reply truncated

2024-03-18 Thread Adam Pribyl
e DNS to be enabled over TCP, so the resolving client may switch to TCP DNS resolution. This was not the case for Windows clients. @Petr Menšík: seem your first assumption may be correct. Thanks for this pointer... Let's see if that helps. Adam Pribyl On Mon, 18 Mar 2024, Adam Pr

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] dnsmasq 2.90 reply truncated

2024-03-19 Thread Adam Pribyl
acket-max option does not workaround the problem for me as dnsmasq "shrinks" the value to the 1232 even this is set larger. Regards Adam Pribyl On Mon, 18 Mar 2024, Adam Pribyl wrote: I tried to increase the --edns-packet-max=1450, did not work, set it to 2048 now resolutio

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] dnsmasq 2.90 reply truncated

2024-04-08 Thread Adam Pribyl
? Great test examples are: - nslookup -type=txt google.com - nslookup -type=txt cisco.com Adam Pribyl On 3/19/24 08:36, Adam Pribyl wrote: Seems the problem is solved by allowing a DNS over TCP for clients. While inability to forward larger EDNS querries ove UDS in 2.90 is certainly a change

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] DNS forwarding steered based on source interface?

2024-04-19 Thread Adam Pribyl
On Thu, 18 Apr 2024, Christopher Hill wrote: Hi, I have a question regarding if upstream DNS forwarding can be based on the source interface? Reading the manual I don't believe it is possible..? The scenario I have is two VLANs that can talk to each other and both use dnsmasqfor local name

[Dnsmasq-discuss] log-queries

2010-07-02 Thread Adam Pribyl
le 2.55 at the machine. Thank you Adam Pribyl

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] log-queries

2010-07-02 Thread Adam Pribyl
On Fri, 2 Jul 2010, Simon Kelley wrote: Adam Pribyl wrote: I am triing to debug some DNS problems on the network, therefore I came to enable log-queries in dnsmasq.conf, but it seems it is logging nothing. A quick poke through the source reveals that DNS is logged a level LOG_DEBUG, but