Or, I think you could skip that if you setup the two, "actual" servers
to NAT all responses appropriate to DNS/DHCP ports, so everything always
looks like it's responding from the .250 address, regardless of whether
the .251 or .252 server actually sent the response.
I could be wrong.
On 12/
I promise, I did search, but couldn't find anything really relevant...
I'm trying to use the cname functionality to map an alias to a
dhcp-leased host. None of the combinations I've tried seem to work.
I notice that the host asked for its name (it is listed in the
dnsmasq.leases file) with a
Is there any opportunity to implement the ability to work with OpenDNS'
new encryption technology? Looks like the source is available.
http://www.opendns.com/technology/dnscrypt/
-AJ
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.
I'm sure I knew the answer to this question...
How do I setup something like an alias for one name to resolve to
another (like a C-NAME), such that I can do some testing while I migrate
from one server to another (and I can therefore test client connections
without changing the client URIs --
Sorry for being a dunce here, but I'm confused as to how to get this
working...
I'm trying to configure some new access points, and when L3 switches,
they try and contact the AP controller via a static/standard URL. I can
SSH into the actual APs and change that address - but that means doing
>Try either dhcp-option=vendor:,1,ip.ip.ip.ip
>or dhcp-option=vendor:,1,http://fqdn:8080/inform
>Refer --dhcp-option
http://www.thekelleys.org.uk/dnsmasq/docs/dnsmasq-man.html for details
OK, so I'm still confused. Is it assumed that if I use
dhcp-option=vendor... that it is option-code 43 (b
Is there a way to set multiple dhcp ranges (on the same interface and
subnet)?
For example, can I set:
DHCP Range = 192.168.1.20-100 AND 192.168.1.130-254
I realize it's a strange request, but wondering if it's possible in
dnsmasq.conf at this time?
Thanks,
AJ
_
*ex:
dhcp-host=00:0c:29:ea:0d:a3,192.168.1.199*
(so dhcp-host=, )
That MAC address will always be given the same, explicit IP Address
(which should be in the DHCP Range that dnsmasq is responsible for).
-AJ
On 12/15/2014 1:37 PM, Chris Green wrote:
As per the subject, if I want to give a h
I'm trying to tune-up my IPCop firewall, and I'm noticing that dnsmasq is
running -- without much of a set of options. Also, dhcpd is running...and I
GUESS it's actually doing the dhcp work.
OK, I guess, but I can't figure out how dnsmasq is pointed to the leases file
for dhcpd and doesn't hav
ck reply. It's much appreciated -- as is the dnsmasq daemon
itself!
-AJ
- Original Message -
From: Simon Kelley
To: AJ Weber
Cc: dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 3:22 PM
Subject: Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] IPCop-specific question
Cache size isn't documented in the conf file...just "Set the cachesize here".
What does the integer represent?
Thanks again,
AJ
- Original Message -
From: Simon Kelley
To: Martin Bretschneider
Cc: dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 3:11 P
If I use a "different" resolv.conf file (i.e. I use a
resolv-file=/etc/resolv.dnsmasq), will an "option" have the same effect it
normally would?
For example, I'm considering changing timeout to 2 (instead of the default of
5), because I've had some issues with my ISP's DNS servers recently and
I've said it before, and I'll say it again: This is a fantastic piece of
software!
Thanks again,
AJ
- Original Message -
From: Simon Kelley
To: AJ Weber
Cc: dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 12:42 PM
Subject: Re: resol
Nice pod-cast. ;)
- Original Message -
From: Jan 'RedBully' Seiffert
To: dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 12:53 PM
Subject: Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] resolver options
AJ Weber wrote:
> If I use a "different" r
action) upstream servers in parallel and just take the first reply. I
don't know if they'd call us a bad Inet citizen if we did that, though. But,
hey, we're making-up for it by caching the reply, right? ;)
-AJ
- Original Message -
From: Simon Kelley
To: AJ Weber
I'm probably going to "move" my dnsmasq install from one server to another.
Will this work:
1) Shutdown/kill dnsmasq on current server;
2) Copy dnsmasq.leases file from current server to "correct location" on
target/new server;
3) Startup dnsmasq on new server.
Will this effectively keep the exi
I have three NICs/interfaces in my server (eth0-2). (IPCop Question coming)
I want to serve DHCP to eth0 and eth2 ONLY.
Thus, I've added the "except-interface=eth1" to the config. That's probably
what I want.
However, I want to serve 198.162.1.x addresses via DHCP to eth0. I want to
serve 1
Boy, was I hoping that was the answer! ;)
Thanks again,
AJ
- Original Message -
From: Simon Kelley
To: AJ Weber
Cc: dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2007 12:43 PM
Subject: Re: Simple config question (I hope)
AJ Weber wrote:
> I h
Unfortunately, it doesn't seem to be working.
It will serve DHCP to the eth0 interface just fine. However, no action from
the eth2 interface.
It does not seem "to just work". :(
How do I go about troubleshooting this?
Thanks,
AJ
- Original Message -----
From: AJ Web
ont-end, but there's nothing
apparent there.)
-AJ
- Original Message -
From: Gilles Espinasse
To: AJ Weber
Cc: dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2007 1:55 PM
Subject: Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Re: Simple config question (I hope)
I'm not an attorney, and I didn't "stay in a Holiday Inn last night". But I've
primarily heard the same arguments against adopting v3 licensed code. They
seem to have overstepped their bounds with this version and many echo the same
sentiment that it will slow the great momentum that open-sour
I'm a little fuzzy on the details, but I think actually it was ReplayTV --
TiVo's rival in the early years -- who had touted the "Commercial Skip"
feature. Go ahead and try and find one of their products now! (Which may
support your theory further...) ;)
-AJ
- Original Message -
OK, I'm looking thru my dnsmasq.conf, but can't justify why this is
happening...nor how it's eventually coming-up with a valid IP address.
I think this has been happening for some-time now, but only recently started
looking-into it, because I'm trying to add a "hosts blacklist" to the config.
M
Subject: Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] uh, domain concats unwanted...
On Thu May 1 2008 10:34:05 AJ Weber wrote:
> OK, I'm looking thru my dnsmasq.conf, but can't justify why this is
> happening...nor how it's eventually coming-up with a valid IP
> address.
Valid?
.atdmt.com.something.bogus' instead.
Paul
p.s. By the way, you do know that OpenDNS offers domain blacklisting by
category automatically? just have to create an account and turn it on.
/dev/rob0 wrote:
On Thu May 1 2008 10:34:05 AJ Weber wrote:
OK, I'm looking thru my dnsmasq.conf,
Is there a way to resolve more than one hostname to a single host? Like an
alias-feature? Analogous to putting a line in /etc/hosts with multiple names
after the IP address? Then have dnsmasq resolve any of the names to the
correct address?
Thanks,
AJ
cific IP).
Thanks for the feedback,
-AJ
- Original Message -
From: Bill C. Riemers
To: AJ Weber
Cc: dnsmasq-disc...@thekelleys.org.uk
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 9:46 AM
Subject: Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] multiple host names?
The easiest way is to use the address dire
Can we make it a low-priority FR? Would seem straight DNS can effectively do
it, as can an /etc/hosts file. Some kind of "alias" feature for hosts?
-AJ
- Original Message -
From: Simon Kelley
To: AJ Weber
Cc: dnsmasq-disc...@thekelleys.org.uk
Sent: Thursday, Se
nd test it ASAP.
Thanks,
AJ
- Original Message -
From: Simon Kelley
To: dnsmasq-disc...@thekelleys.org.uk ; AJ Weber
Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2008 7:04 AM
Subject: CNAME/alias function added dnsmasq-2.46test15
I've just uploaded
http://thekelleys.org.uk/dnsmasq/t
Mirage indeed! ;)
- Original Message -
From: Simon Kelley
To: AJ Weber
Cc: dnsmasq-disc...@thekelleys.org.uk
Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2008 9:11 AM
Subject: Re: CNAME/alias function added dnsmasq-2.46test15
AJ Weber wrote:
>
> Did you document it anywhere
Yeah, you're probably better installing something like pen or another
readily-available load-balancer. Some of them are very lightweight, but
would require you to send all traffic back to your controller (set
server.test.local as an alias of controller.test.local), and then the
load-balancer w
Is there a way to add "exceptions" to when you have a "local-only"
("local=my-domain.com") directive?
For example, I would like to allow global DNS to serve the name for my website
(even internally) which is www.my-domain.com, of course, but would like to
continue to only resolve others from my
ing to the same
target.
On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 4:07 PM, AJ Weber wrote:
I actually have another name outside I could use CNAME for. Is
that an
option I don't see in my dnsmasq.conf file? That would work fine,
I think.
Thanks,
AJ
- Original Message - From:
To: "AJ W
was a fairly good reason, but I can't remember.
2) The idea of having a default ip-address/resolve-address such as your
suggestion to use all zeros = use the default/configured DNS servers is
excellent.
Thanks again,
AJ
- Original Message -
From: "Simon Kelley"
To: &
34 matches
Mail list logo
