Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] trouble with host resolution

2024-11-20 Thread Bernd Prager
Never mind, I found the mistake: I forgot to put the "search" in resolv.conf: search prager.homeip.net On 11/20/24 2:08 PM, Bernd Prager wrote: I am running dnsmasq version 2.90 with following configuration:""" domain-needed bogus-priv no-resolv no-poll server=8.8.8.8 server=8.8.4.4 server=1.1.

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH 1/1] forward.c: fix handling of truncated response

2024-11-20 Thread Simon Kelley
On 10/2/24 17:00, Dominik Derigs via Dnsmasq-discuss wrote: Hey all, having this configurable makes sense particularly thinking about the multitude of IoT devices often receiving not all that much attention from their manufacturers. A particular example is the camera Tapo C-310 which seems

[Dnsmasq-discuss] trouble with host resolution

2024-11-20 Thread Bernd Prager
I am running dnsmasq version 2.90 with following configuration:""" domain-needed bogus-priv no-resolv no-poll server=8.8.8.8 server=8.8.4.4 server=1.1.1.1 bind-dynamic domain=prager.homeip.net expand-hosts dhcp-range=192.168.1.120,192.168.1.200,12h dhcp-option=option:router,192.168.1.1 dhcp-option

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] About resolution performance and adblock

2024-11-20 Thread Leonid Evdokimov
On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 8:05 PM Ercolino de Spiacico wrote: > If given the possibility, I would be very happy to map a file in RAM knowing > that > this is handled differently from the "standard" conf-file. I agree with this point and I'm developing libddt (dense domain table) that is basically

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] About resolution performance and adblock

2024-11-20 Thread Ercolino de Spiacico
Indeed, I think the point is straight forward, there are part of dnsmasq where we do want to comply with RFC, etc, others that are locally significant only and can bypass certain check, adblock being one of those. There are a number of lists I can suggest, see this link we maintain: https://wi

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] About resolution performance and adblock

2024-11-20 Thread Chris Green
On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 04:06:08PM +0300, Leonid Evdokimov wrote: > On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 8:05 PM Ercolino de Spiacico > wrote: > > If given the possibility, I would be very happy to map a file in RAM > > knowing that > > this is handled differently from the "standard" conf-file. > > I agree w

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH 1/1] forward.c: fix handling of truncated response

2024-11-20 Thread Simon Kelley
Apolgies for top-posting. Here's a log extract showing a validated answer for time.nist.gov WITHOUT returning a TRUNCATED answer to the client. Simon. dnsmasq: UDP 1 ::1/41670 query[A] time.nist.gov from ::1 dnsmasq: UDP 1 ::1/41670 forwarded time.nist.gov to 8.8.8.8 dnsmasq: UDP 1 ::1/41670