Hi,
> Patch modified to keep backwards compatibility with HAVE_NETTLEHASH
> because, why not? and applied. Looks like a sensible idea.
Indeed, much better. Thank you
--
Best Regards, Vladislav Grishenko
> -Original Message-
> From: Dnsmasq-discuss On
> Behalf Of Simon Kelley
> Sent: Mo
Hi Vladislav,
Where is openssl version used anyway? Would it make sense to support
multiple crypto libraries? Why is just nettle support inadequate? Our
crypto team asked me, why is nettle used. It has no independent FIPS
ceritification, so they would like to use different library, like gnutls
or
On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 8:57 AM Christian Ehrhardt
wrote:
>
> Hi,
> since nothing happened on this topic (e.g. committed to git / further
> discussion) I wondered if you waited for a confirmation.
>
> The first patch by Iain was ignored or not seen, I'd expect both might work.
> Nevertheless in ca
Last week's 2.83 release has proved to have a regression. The symptoms
are random log messages reporting "failure to send packet" and the DNS
query associated with this is lost. Retries of the query do not fail, so
the operational effect of this is minimal. To trigger the bug, dnsmasq
has to be und
> Get it here:
>
> http://www.thekelleys.org.uk/dnsmasq/dnsmasq-2.84.tar.gz
The version string generated is "2.84rc2"
$ cat dnsmasq-2.84/VERSION
(HEAD -> master, tag: v2.84rc2, tag: v2.84, origin/master, origin/HEAD)
Lonnie
___
Dnsmasq-discuss
> On Jan 25, 2021, at 5:21 PM, Lonnie Abelbeck
> wrote:
>
>
>> Get it here:
>>
>> http://www.thekelleys.org.uk/dnsmasq/dnsmasq-2.84.tar.gz
>
> The version string generated is "2.84rc2"
>
> $ cat dnsmasq-2.84/VERSION
> (HEAD -> master, tag: v2.84rc2, tag: v2.84, origin/master, origin/HEAD
Hi Petr,
> Where is openssl version used anyway?
In https://asuswrt-merlin.net, embedded software for wireless routers
> Would it make sense to support multiple crypto libraries?
Taking into account existing official support of nettle and required support of
system openssl (in asuswrt-merlin) -
