On Mon, 10 May 2021 at 01:17, Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Dnsmasq-discuss <
dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk> wrote:
> On 08.05.21 22:44, Mark wrote:
> >Thanks for the suggestion Petr - have put a DNAT rule in place - does the
> >job. :)
>
> at least until one of your clients start complaini
On 08.05.21 22:44, Mark wrote:
Thanks for the suggestion Petr - have put a DNAT rule in place - does the
job. :)
at least until one of your clients start complaining that you are hijacking
their SMTP connections, which may lead to legal issues.
On Sat, 8 May 2021 at 06:33, Petr Menšík wrote:
Thanks for the suggestion Petr - have put a DNAT rule in place - does the
job. :)
On Sat, 8 May 2021 at 06:33, Petr Menšík wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> I don't think there exists way to do what you requested using dnsmasq.
>
> However, it might work to DNAT rule outgoing SMTP connections to your
> sma
Hello,
On 07.05.21 22:13, Petr Menšík wrote:
I don't think there exists way to do what you requested using dnsmasq.
However, it might work to DNAT rule outgoing SMTP connections to your
smarthost, moving this decision from DNS to IP firewall/NAT. Could be
done only on some gateway of course.
B
Hi Mark,
I don't think there exists way to do what you requested using dnsmasq.
However, it might work to DNAT rule outgoing SMTP connections to your
smarthost, moving this decision from DNS to IP firewall/NAT. Could be
done only on some gateway of course.
But I think your users would not like s
> Op 7 mei 2021 om 16:33 heeft Mark het volgende
> geschreven:
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I know there are MX related configuration options which can be used in
> dnsmasq.conf (mx-host, mx-target, selfmx and localmx) - however, none of them
> appear to be able to deliver the specific functionality I
