Hi Dennis,
yes, I missed to see you're the owner of lovelady.com ;-)
to all readers:
But, anyway, can this kind of resolving cause any additional trouble?
I think about: Your local PCs get 192.168/21 answers, while the
remaining world get others?
Isn't it the task of your router to shortcut your P
Just saw this; sorry.
> I think your domain is not a good idea. It doesn't cause the seen
> problems to you. And it might not cause any problems to you, if you own
> this domain.
> But if you are connected to the internet, you should better not use
> official domains for private local networks, li
> > seems that there is a "log-dhcp" configuration parameter with no
> > counterpart. Given that, I expected the default to be "don't log."
> >
>
> It is, or at least its "do minimal logging of DHCP interactions,
> considered to be generally useful." Setting --log-dhcp produces much
> more inform
dnsm...@lovelady.com wrote:
>> The question, surely, is why
>> is the client repeatedly getting a DHCP lease de-novo.
>
> Thank you for your reply, Simon, but no -that is not the question. The
> question is "how to I make dnsmasq NOT log DHCP requests to syslog? It
> seems that there is a "log-
asq-
> discuss-boun...@lists.thekelleys.org.uk] On Behalf Of Ed W
> Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2011 11:15 AM
> To: dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
> Subject: Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Logging of DHCP activity
>
> On 25/05/2011 15:18, dnsm...@lovelady.com wrote:
> > Thank y
On 25/05/2011 15:18, dnsm...@lovelady.com wrote:
> Thank you for your reply, Simon, but no -that is not the question. The
> question is "how to I make dnsmasq NOT log DHCP requests to syslog? It
> seems that there is a "log-dhcp" configuration parameter with no
> counterpart. Given that, I expec
> The question, surely, is why
> is the client repeatedly getting a DHCP lease de-novo.
Thank you for your reply, Simon, but no -that is not the question. The
question is "how to I make dnsmasq NOT log DHCP requests to syslog? It
seems that there is a "log-dhcp" configuration parameter with no
dnsm...@lovelady.com wrote:
> That would be amusing if it wasn't sad. How does a network loop?
>
> The reason the for the repeated dhcp requests was implied in my prior
> message, but I will spell it out: I had two interfaces to which a single IP
> address was allocated, and the Winbolws machine
AM
> To: dnsm...@lovelady.com
> Cc: dnsmasq-disc...@thekelleys.org.uk
> Subject: Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Logging of DHCP activity
>
>
> On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 05:49:40AM -0400, dnsm...@lovelady.com wrote:
> > Hi, All:
> >
> >
> >
> > I woke today to find th
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 05:49:40AM -0400, dnsm...@lovelady.com wrote:
> Hi, All:
>
>
>
> I woke today to find that for the second time my /var/log filesytem was full
> due to the size of the messages log. This time and last time, the log was
> over 95% due to dhcp logging, and I don't underst
10 matches
Mail list logo
