On 15/06/2011 09:29, Simon Kelley wrote:
> Jan's valgrind suggestion is a good one, as is using netstat to look at
> the size of socket receive queues.
Although if he can show that a rack reboot works with 200 leases and not
in an identical setup with 7,000 leases then it might point to the softwa
Mike Ruiz wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> We use dnsmasq as a very effective replacement for the ISC software,
> thus far with great success. However, we have run into occasional
> performance problems at scale.
>
> These seem to manifest as a general slowdown of the request -> reply
> process, which can
2011/6/14 Mike Ruiz :
> Hello All,
> We use dnsmasq as a very effective replacement for the ISC software, thus
> far with great success. However, we have run into occasional performance
> problems at scale.
> These seem to manifest as a general slowdown of the request -> reply
> process, which can
Hello All,
We use dnsmasq as a very effective replacement for the ISC software, thus far
with great success. However, we have run into occasional performance problems
at scale.
These seem to manifest as a general slowdown of the request -> reply process,
which can sometimes exceed 90 seconds f
