On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 7:30 PM, A C wrote:
>>
>> Does that give you enough time to get a new version in place?
>>
>> Simon.
>
> Well, not really. I don't have the ability to generate a package for the
> embedded system so I'm at the mercy of the package maintainer. I've already
> mailed them to
> Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 21:52:38 -0400
> From: c...@cmpalmer.org
> To: ag...@hotmail.com
> Subject: Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Question about DNS vunlerabiltiy in dnsmasq
> CC: dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
>
> On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 7:30 PM, A C wrote:
> &g
> Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 18:05:27 +0100
> From: si...@thekelleys.org.uk
> To: ag...@hotmail.com
> CC: dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
> Subject: Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Question about DNS vunlerabiltiy in dnsmasq
>
> A C wrote:
> > I'm running dnsmasq 2.3
Simon Kelley wrote:
A C wrote:
I'm running dnsmasq 2.35 but it's on an embedded system and the
package manager hasn't created a new version yet. I wanted to know
how vulnerable I was to the recent security alert regarding DNS and
whether there's a potential workaround that I could put in plac
A C wrote:
I'm running dnsmasq 2.35 but it's on an embedded system and the package
manager hasn't created a new version yet. I wanted to know how
vulnerable I was to the recent security alert regarding DNS and whether
there's a potential workaround that I could put in place for now.
"How v
I'm running dnsmasq 2.35 but it's on an embedded system and the package manager
hasn't created a new version yet. I wanted to know how vulnerable I was to the
recent security alert regarding DNS and whether there's a potential workaround
that I could put in place for now.
Thanks,
Alex
__
