?
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Neustradamus
De : Dnsmasq-discuss de la
part de Dirk Fieldhouse
Envoyé : mardi 2 février 2021 01:46
À : dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
Objet : Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Announce: dnsmasq-2.84 - sort and semantic
On 01/02/2021 23:55, Simon Kelley wrote:
>
I just committed another tweak, to get eg v2.65test1 and v2.65test11 in
the correct order.
Maybe the missing description of 2.84 could be added to CHANGELOG and
the resulting commit, exceptionally, re-tagged as 2.84?
Wouldn't this also avoid accid
On 31/01/2021 11:21, Geert Stappers wrote:
>
> Besides not pretty, it is also not readable.
> Plus '-k 1.6,1.6' looks very odd in that line.
>
> | sort -k1.2,1.5r -k1.6,1.7r -k1.8,1.9r -k1.10,1.11r
> looks more "having a pattern"
But it's wrong. The -k1.6,1.6 sorts on the first letter _after_
On 31/01/2021 19:27, Matthias Andree wrote:
> Am 31.01.21 um 12:21 schrieb Geert Stappers:
>> Lonnie Abelbeck's hint on another release was indeed very humble
>> and very polite. And yes, he is right with expressing
>> We do ourself and the rest of mankind a favour by avoiding
>> version string
On Sun, Jan 31, 2021 at 12:21:11PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote:
> De : Simon Kelley
> Envoyé : samedi 30 janvier 2021 00:19
> > On 26/01/2021 16:55, M. Buecher wrote:
> > > On 2021-01-26 17:41, M. Buecher wrote:
> > >> On 2021-01-26 00:43, Lonnie Abelbeck wrote:
> > >>> On Jan 25, 2021, at 5:21 PM
Am 31.01.21 um 12:21 schrieb Geert Stappers:
> Lonnie Abelbeck's hint on another release was indeed very humble
> and very polite. And yes, he is right with expressing
> We do ourself and the rest of mankind a favour by avoiding
> version string "2.84rc2" for verion "2.84"
Oh dear. It's not th
De : Simon Kelley
Envoyé : samedi 30 janvier 2021 00:19
> On 26/01/2021 16:55, M. Buecher wrote:
> > On 2021-01-26 17:41, M. Buecher wrote:
> >> On 2021-01-26 00:43, Lonnie Abelbeck wrote:
> >>> On Jan 25, 2021, at 5:21 PM, Lonnie Abelbeck wrote:
>
> The version string generated is "2.84
De : Dnsmasq-discuss de la
part de Simon Kelley
Envoyé : samedi 30 janvier 2021 00:19
À : dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
Objet : Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Announce: dnsmasq-2.84 - sort and semantic
versioning
On 26/01/2021 16:55, M. Buecher wrote:
>
>
> On 2021-01-26 17:41, M. B
On 26/01/2021 16:55, M. Buecher wrote:
>
>
> On 2021-01-26 17:41, M. Buecher wrote:
>> On 2021-01-26 00:43, Lonnie Abelbeck wrote:
On Jan 25, 2021, at 5:21 PM, Lonnie Abelbeck
wrote:
> Get it here:
>
> http://www.thekelleys.org.uk/dnsmasq/dnsmasq-2.84.tar.gz
On 2021-01-26 17:41, M. Buecher wrote:
On 2021-01-26 00:43, Lonnie Abelbeck wrote:
On Jan 25, 2021, at 5:21 PM, Lonnie Abelbeck
wrote:
Get it here:
http://www.thekelleys.org.uk/dnsmasq/dnsmasq-2.84.tar.gz
The version string generated is "2.84rc2"
$ cat dnsmasq-2.84/VERSION
(HEAD -> m
> On Jan 25, 2021, at 5:21 PM, Lonnie Abelbeck
> wrote:
>
>
>> Get it here:
>>
>> http://www.thekelleys.org.uk/dnsmasq/dnsmasq-2.84.tar.gz
>
> The version string generated is "2.84rc2"
>
> $ cat dnsmasq-2.84/VERSION
> (HEAD -> master, tag: v2.84rc2, tag: v2.84, origin/master, origin/HEAD
> Get it here:
>
> http://www.thekelleys.org.uk/dnsmasq/dnsmasq-2.84.tar.gz
The version string generated is "2.84rc2"
$ cat dnsmasq-2.84/VERSION
(HEAD -> master, tag: v2.84rc2, tag: v2.84, origin/master, origin/HEAD)
Lonnie
___
Dnsmasq-discuss
Last week's 2.83 release has proved to have a regression. The symptoms
are random log messages reporting "failure to send packet" and the DNS
query associated with this is lost. Retries of the query do not fail, so
the operational effect of this is minimal. To trigger the bug, dnsmasq
has to be und
13 matches
Mail list logo
