If you're going to use more natural internal representations of DNS
datastructures and then convert them to line format at the end, there
are much more deserving cases than this. I think I must have been
certifiably mad to do DNSSEC validation on a line-format representation
of a DNS packet. It end
Ouch, that ancount increase seems quite weird. What if we still used
break to avoid printing all parts never added to message?
It seems to me multibyte variables in dns_header should be converted
just once after receiving and converted back to network order just once
before sending. Constant conve
On 30/09/2021 23:49, Petr Menšík wrote:
> Thanks!
>
> I were checking it a bit on test build and found part of file
> 0013-Fix-coverity-issues-detected-in-domain-match.c.patch avoided
> application. domain-match.c:447 still has add_resource_record return
> value unchecked, unlike A record above.
>
Thanks!
I were checking it a bit on test build and found part of file
0013-Fix-coverity-issues-detected-in-domain-match.c.patch avoided
application. domain-match.c:447 still has add_resource_record return
value unchecked, unlike A record above.
Btw, return values shadows truncp pointer. If add_re
