fixed:
https://thekelleys.org.uk/gitweb/?p=dnsmasq.git;a=commit;h=f006be7842104a9f86fbf419326b7aad08ade61d
I’ll move forward with that fix and upgrade to 2.91 when it’s released. Thanks
for your time!
-- Sam Clippinger
From: Dimitry Andric
Date: Thursday, February 13, 2025 at 12
5 fa:16:3e:3b:ad:b9 10.1.2.3 np0006812233 *
What can I do to help troubleshoot this? I know C but I’m not familiar with
the dnsmasq code. Thanks in advance!
-- Sam Clippinger
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.or
Hello,
I have settings with both addn-hosts= and nftset=, and hoping hosts in
addn-hosts will be added to nft set.
Here is my configs
# /etc/dnsmasq/dnsmasq.conf
nftset=/myems-test.com/4#ip#test#vpn4
# /etc/dnsmasq/dnsmasq.d/domain_address.conf
addn-hosts=/etc/dnsmasq/dnsmasq.d/domain_
26],solium,solium..xxx
dhcp-host=fa:76:fc:xx:xx:xx,set:Clients-v6,[::222],fenestram,fenestram..xxx
dhcp-host=id:00:01:00:01:23:f2:35:79:6c:0b:84:xx:xx:xx,set:Clients-v6,[::250],imbrem,imbrem..xxx
Thanks,
Sam
___
Dnsmasq-d
q is doing 'same net' checking on the incoming interface
subnet and to-be-assigned IP address.
Usage is simple:
dhcp-range=wan,XXX.XXX.XXX.1,*virtual*,255.255.255.240,12h
It's a quick hack, but it works for me perfectly.
Kind regards
Sam
diff --git a/src/dhcp.c b/src/dhcp.c
inde
q is doing 'same net' checking on the incoming interface
subnet and to-be-assigned IP address.
Usage is simple:
dhcp-range=wan,XXX.XXX.XXX.1,*virtual*,255.255.255.240,12h
It's a quick hack, but it works for me perfectly.
Kind regards
Sam
virtual-dhcp-range.diff
diff --git
In our system, when a change occurs to the DNS entries we want dnsmasq to
respond to, we scan the directory of active entries and then grep the
dhcp.leases file to see if the entry exists there. If the entry is not
found in the leases file, we omit it. Once the scan and check is
completed, we wri
On 10/10/2016, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 02:53:44PM +0100, Sam Kuper wrote:
>> I was setting up an OpenWRT router recently, and wanted to be able
>> to improve the privacy of DNS requests made from that router and
>> from the PCs on the LAN.
>>
>>
On 10/10/2016, Sam Kuper wrote:
> Dear Dnsmasq folk [...]
Apologies, some of the formatting went awry in my previous message.
Let me try that again.
Dear Dnsmasq folk,
This is my first foray onto the mailing list, and I am not very
experienced with Dnsmasq or indeed DNS, so please be gen
Dear Dnsmasq folk,
This is my first foray onto the mailing list, and I am not very
experienced with Dnsmasq or indeed DNS, so please be gentle.
I was setting up an OpenWRT router recently, and wanted to be able to
improve the privacy of DNS requests made from that router and from the
PCs on the L
though you'd have to
prevent a infinite loop.
Thanks,
Sam.
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
issed? I do realize I could restart dnsmasq but I still think it would
be handy if host at least were polled.
Thanks for any help,
-Sam.
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/lis
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 07:41:02PM +0100, s...@sltosis.org wrote:
>
>
> Hello,
>
> I recently bought a laptop with UEFI, this has been somewhat painfull until
> now, so I may be doing something wrong!
>
>
> Anyway, there seems to have two PXE modes on this laptop, the legacy one and
> the one
Hello,
I recently bought a laptop with UEFI, this has been somewhat painfull until
now, so I may be doing something wrong!
Anyway, there seems to have two PXE modes on this laptop, the legacy one and
the one with UEFI. In some of my desperates attempts to boot the thing
via(on?) UEFI, I've se
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 09:03:03AM -0600, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 12:13:07PM +0100, s...@sltosis.org wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 06:11:43PM -0600, richardvo...@gmail.com
> > wrote:
> > > On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 5:05 PM, /dev/rob0
> > > wrote:
> > > > > On 10/11/2012 15:
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 06:11:43PM -0600, richardvo...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 5:05 PM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
>
> > > On 10/11/2012 15:54, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> > > >Seems to me that dnsmasq is a better nscd replacement, and
> > > >it has a place in mobile computing.
> > > >
> > > ># we
o focus on the changes required at the dnsmasq level
(client side). I appreciate your suggestions regarding the CPAN
modules, but I'm intending for this to function on small embedded
devices (typically ~4MB flash), and getting Perl on there is quite
unlikely.
Thanks,
Sam
On 8 August 2011 14:
oughts you or anyone else had.
Thanks again,
Sam
On 7 August 2011 18:22, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 07, 2011 at 03:05:25PM +0100, Sam Crawford wrote:
>> I'm looking to selectively block certain domains using dnsmasq by
>> rewriting responses. I realise this can already
s there something
else that does it natively that I've overlooked?
2) Can anyone point me towards where I should start looking in the
source to incorporate the changes?
Any advice would be greatly appreciated. I've searched the mailing
list archives and couldn't find anything quite like this.
Thanks,
Sam
19 matches
Mail list logo
