Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] filter-AAAA is breaking dnsmasq

2021-10-09 Thread Trey Sis
Hi, you shouldn't really do that anyways. Removing records is usually a very bad idea. It will also keep your network from being ready for the future. Cheers, T On 10/10/2021 2:08, E wrote: dnsmasq can't start when the user add filter- or --filter- to conf file.

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Is there some way I can tell dnsmasq to give a negative reply to any IPv6 query?

2021-09-23 Thread Trey Sis
atch that would do this (although no autodetection). However, my patch had some serious flaws and I have no idea how to implement it now (I was told I have to use rrfilter, but I am too unskilled in C to understand how it's all connected under the hood). Cheers, Treysis On Thu, Sep 23

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Is there some way I can tell dnsmasq to give a negative reply to any IPv6 query?

2021-09-23 Thread Trey Sis
There's something wrong with your setup. Did you manually configure an IPv6 address for your machine? wget shouldn't try the IPv6 address if there is no route to the destination. Cheers, Treysis On 9/23/2021 10:02, Rick Thomas wrote: My ISP does not support IPv6 at all. Recently I have been h

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Patch with option to filter A records

2021-09-02 Thread Trey Sis
On 7/9/2021 17:46, Geert Stappers via Dnsmasq-discuss wrote: On Fri, Jul 09, 2021 at 02:35:29PM +0200, Petr Menšík wrote: On 6/16/21 1:26 PM, Trey Sis wrote: On 6/14/2021 1:43, Trey Sis wrote: On 6/13/2021 22:01, Geert Stappers wrote: warning: 1 line adds whitespace errors. My bad! Fixed

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Noob question

2021-08-30 Thread Trey Sis
I think he meant dropping the DNS request. On 8/31/2021 0:39, wkitt...@gmail.com wrote: On 8/30/21 6:00 PM, rrandom via Dnsmasq-discuss wrote: Thank you. Btw why dnsmasq redirects that connections but doesn't just drop them? Honestly, I don't know much about networking but simple dropping seems

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Noob question

2021-08-30 Thread Trey Sis
On 8/30/2021 13:15, Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Dnsmasq-discuss wrote: On 30.08.21 13:06, rrandom via Dnsmasq-discuss wrote: Hello.  In one of the dnsmasq filterlists I found that domains redirected to `#` like `address=/example.com/#` Wouldn't it be better to return NXDOMAIN instead of all-zer

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Patch with option to filter A records

2021-06-24 Thread Trey Sis
On 6/21/2021 22:15, Geert Stappers via Dnsmasq-discuss wrote: On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 11:54:02AM +0200, Trey Sis wrote: On 6/14/2021 1:43, Trey Sis wrote: On 6/13/2021 22:01, Geert Stappers via Dnsmasq-discuss wrote: ... /home/stappers/src/dnsmasq/.git/rebase-apply/patch:62

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Patch with option to filter A records

2021-06-16 Thread Trey Sis
On 6/14/2021 1:43, Trey Sis wrote: On 6/13/2021 22:01, Geert Stappers via Dnsmasq-discuss wrote: On Wed, Jun 09, 2021 at 02:13:34PM +0200, Trey Sis wrote: Dropping the patch file as attachment.  From 57c7fcb0b3caccae7376f71ab1a9ae74f0e7f6d9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: treysis Date: Sat, 5

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Patch with option to filter A records

2021-06-14 Thread Trey Sis
Any chance to get this reviewed and maybe added to upstream, Simon? I think it's a valuable feature that might be used by quite some people, especially with the increasing rollout of IPv6. On 6/14/2021 1:43, Trey Sis wrote: On 6/13/2021 22:01, Geert Stappers via Dnsmasq-discuss wrote: O

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Patch with option to filter A records

2021-06-13 Thread Trey Sis
On 6/13/2021 22:01, Geert Stappers via Dnsmasq-discuss wrote: On Wed, Jun 09, 2021 at 02:13:34PM +0200, Trey Sis wrote: Dropping the patch file as attachment. From 57c7fcb0b3caccae7376f71ab1a9ae74f0e7f6d9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: treysis Date: Sat, 5 Jun 2021 15:27:26 +0200 Subject

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Patch with option to filter A records

2021-06-09 Thread Trey Sis
Dropping the patch file as attachment. On 6/5/2021 18:20, Trey Sis wrote: For some reason I didn't receive all mails from the list in my inbox, so I'll reply to this mail. Also sorry if I mess something up. I haven't used a mailing list in over two decades. On 6/5/2021 17:37,

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH 1/2] Add option to filter out A record requests

2021-06-05 Thread Trey Sis
or records (so the inverse). I am not sure if that had been mentioned here. I seem to recall it had appeared here in the past. But I am not even sure that is the original author. At "Trey Sis", can you confirm that your original patch applies cleanly at the tip of the developm

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Patch with option to filter A records

2021-06-05 Thread Trey Sis
For some reason I didn't receive all mails from the list in my inbox, so I'll reply to this mail. Also sorry if I mess something up. I haven't used a mailing list in over two decades. On 6/5/2021 17:37, Geert Stappers via Dnsmasq-discuss wrote: On Sat, Jun 05, 2021 at 03:34:59PM

[Dnsmasq-discuss] Patch with option to filter A records

2021-06-05 Thread Trey Sis
Hello everyone! I have created a patch that adds an option to dnsmasq to filter out A record requests. This is particularly suitable for IPv6-only environments. Some software (especially NodeJS) will reorder DNS requests giving priority to A records, irrespective of IPv4 connectivity of the hos

[Dnsmasq-discuss] DNS64 support

2020-07-31 Thread Trey Sis
Hi everyone,   may I suggest adding an option for DNS64, i.e. synthesizing of records given a specified prefix for IPv4-only hostnames? I see this has been brought up, but almost 10 years ago. With dnsmasq being widely in use on many home routers, I think this would be a valuable addition. E