[Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] pxe-service entries in dnsmasq conf seem to fail non-proxy EFI boot

2024-09-08 Thread Shrenik Bhura
Hi Simon, This is with reference to an old discussion thread from 2021 which was resolved with the patch provided by Petr. However for some reason it doesn't s

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Option 12 hostname sent to RPi seems incorrect

2021-10-27 Thread Shrenik Bhura
Menšík 's finding as it may reinforce the above explanations. Regards, Shrenik On Wed, 27 Oct, 2021, 21:45 Geoff Back, wrote: > Hi Shrenik, > > On 27/10/2021 16:38, Shrenik Bhura wrote: > > Hi Geoff, > > I don't expect it to at all set a hostname. > > > I th

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Option 12 hostname sent to RPi seems incorrect

2021-10-27 Thread Shrenik Bhura
re you > expecting to set? > > Regards, > > Geoff. > > > On 27/10/2021 14:06, Shrenik Bhura wrote: > > > but my rpi machines received hostname set from dnsmasq. I used static > allocations only for my testing. > > Try without setting any. > > > Ca

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Option 12 hostname sent to RPi seems incorrect

2021-10-27 Thread Shrenik Bhura
share at > least relevant part of dnsmasq configuration? > > Does it have dhcp-host record for that machine? > On 10/25/21 16:00, Shrenik Bhura wrote: > > > On Mon, 25 Oct, 2021, 01:24 Matthias May via Dnsmasq-discuss, < > dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk> wrote:

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Option 12 hostname sent to RPi seems incorrect

2021-10-25 Thread Shrenik Bhura
On Mon, 25 Oct, 2021, 01:24 Matthias May via Dnsmasq-discuss, < dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk> wrote: > On 21/10/2021 13:05, Shrenik Bhura wrote: > > May be the code that logs this line needs to be checked if it is just > printing part of the complete hostname i

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Option 12 hostname sent to RPi seems incorrect

2021-10-21 Thread Shrenik Bhura
On Thu, 21 Oct 2021 at 03:04, Geert Stappers via Dnsmasq-discuss < dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 10:56:02PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 02:48:27PM +0530, Shrenik Bhura wrote: > > > On Wed, 20 Oct, 20

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Option 12 hostname sent to RPi seems incorrect

2021-10-20 Thread Shrenik Bhura
On Wed, 20 Oct, 2021, 11:21 Geert Stappers via Dnsmasq-discuss, < dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 07:50:58AM +0530, Shrenik Bhura wrote: > > On Tue, 19 Oct 2021 at 21:01, Dominik Derigs wrote: > > > > > Hey Shrenik, > &

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Option 12 hostname sent to RPi seems incorrect

2021-10-19 Thread Shrenik Bhura
21:01, Dominik Derigs wrote: > Hey Shrenik, > > On Tue, 2021-10-19 at 17:20 +0530, Shrenik Bhura wrote: > > Option 12 hostname sent to RPi is the first octet of the IP > > address. This seems incorrect. > > This can very well be desired behavior (if the hostname is set

[Dnsmasq-discuss] Option 12 hostname sent to RPi seems incorrect

2021-10-19 Thread Shrenik Bhura
Option 12 hostname sent to RPi is the first octet of the IP address. This seems incorrect. For example, if the IP address is 192.168.67.53, the value visible in the logs is - *Oct 19 16:38:49 server dnsmasq-dhcp[14224]: 1870967312 sent size: 3 option: 12 hostname 192* and so is in the value in /

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Fwd: [PATCH] Re: pxe-service entries in dnsmasq conf seem to fail non-proxy EFI boot

2021-10-15 Thread Shrenik Bhura
same. On Fri, 15 Oct 2021 at 18:41, Shrenik Bhura wrote: > No changes need in ltsp-dnsmasq.conf . Just checked out from Petr's > branch, compiled and replaced /usr/sbin/dnsmasq with the new one. > > Regards, > Shrenik > > On Fri, 15 Oct, 2021, 17:16 Alkis Georgopoulos,

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Fwd: [PATCH] Re: pxe-service entries in dnsmasq conf seem to fail non-proxy EFI boot

2021-10-15 Thread Shrenik Bhura
re any changes required in ltsp-dnsmasq.conf? > Or we just need to apply Petr's patch, compile/install, and it works? > Thank you as well for your persistence and testing! > > Cheers, > Alkis > > On 10/15/21 2:42 PM, Shrenik Bhura wrote: > The below response is to be r

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] Re: pxe-service entries in dnsmasq conf seem to fail non-proxy EFI boot

2021-10-15 Thread Shrenik Bhura
, 2021, 09:58 Shrenik Bhura, wrote: > Thanks Petr for the detailed revert. > > I shall try again with the pxe-services branch and revert with my test > results. > > Meanwhile I am trying to answer few of your queries - > > > I have had trouble with proxy mode and I am not

[Dnsmasq-discuss] Fwd: [PATCH] Re: pxe-service entries in dnsmasq conf seem to fail non-proxy EFI boot

2021-10-15 Thread Shrenik Bhura
The below response is to be read in the thread prior to the "all success scenario" email. Apologies for the confusion but I only realised now that the post went off-list just to Petr. Regards, Shrenik -- Forwarded message ----- From: Shrenik Bhura Date: Tue, 12 Oct, 2

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] Re: pxe-service entries in dnsmasq conf seem to fail non-proxy EFI boot

2021-10-09 Thread Shrenik Bhura
Adding Alkis and Jigish back to the thread via cc. On Sat, 9 Oct 2021 at 15:18, Shrenik Bhura wrote: > Hey Petr, > > I have read your post a few times but am only partially able to understand > everything. It may be my lack of knowledge of the inner workings of all > things in

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] Re: pxe-service entries in dnsmasq conf seem to fail non-proxy EFI boot

2021-10-09 Thread Shrenik Bhura
Hey Petr, I have read your post a few times but am only partially able to understand everything. It may be my lack of knowledge of the inner workings of all things involved. I shall give it a go again later and even try the patch. But where do you want me to apply the patch - on the master branch

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] Re: pxe-service entries in dnsmasq conf seem to fail non-proxy EFI boot

2021-10-07 Thread Shrenik Bhura
Hey Petr, Some screenshots that may be helpful - bios-proxy-fail : https://drive.google.com/file/d/1KtG2mgIPIU9Ny3AGLjkIfzcOB90jaYFj/view?usp=sharing efi-proxy-fail : https://drive.google.com/file/d/1L1223jrsS68XcHBE5B9wrAP3n7Db1OrF/view?usp=sharing On Thu, 7 Oct 2021 at 12:36, Shrenik Bhura

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] Re: pxe-service entries in dnsmasq conf seem to fail non-proxy EFI boot

2021-10-07 Thread Shrenik Bhura
Hi Petr, Thanks for all your help. Have done a build from the fork shared above. Herein are the test results. Now: Rpi + proxy success Rpi + noproxy success Efi + proxy failure Efi + noproxy success BIOS + proxy failure BIOS + noproxy success Earlier it was only: Efi + noproxy failure I believe

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] pxe-service entries in dnsmasq conf seem to fail non-proxy EFI boot

2021-10-06 Thread Shrenik Bhura
Hi all, Alkis has highlighted the main question once again. Thanks Alkis. Now trying to provide the answers to Petr's queries - It seems to me the answer lies only on its boot rom firmware. I just expect > both used matching configuration and dnsmasq version. > This is the case with an Intel NU

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] pxe-service entries in dnsmasq conf seem to fail non-proxy EFI boot

2021-10-02 Thread Shrenik Bhura
Hi Petr, Is there anything else needed from me on this to diagnose this further? Last I had shared the log and pcap corresponding to the case 1. i.e., pxe-service entries with tag:proxy with dhcp-boot . Regards, Shrenik On Thu, 30 Sep, 2021, 16:17 Shrenik Bhura, wrote: > > 1. seems t

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] pxe-service entries in dnsmasq conf seem to fail non-proxy EFI boot

2021-09-30 Thread Shrenik Bhura
t; think it should behave the same way in both situations. > > I attached patch, which would set boot file on pxe-service the same way as > dhcp-boot. It may require dhcp-no-override where it did not before. Could > you please try it? > On 9/28/21 11:54, Shrenik Bhura wrote: > &

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] pxe-service entries in dnsmasq conf seem to fail non-proxy EFI boot

2021-09-28 Thread Shrenik Bhura
ot menu on that > station? Did it show anything? Are those machines with normal VGA output? > Perhaps LOG_LEVEL in PXE [2] might reveal true reason. > > Cheers, > Petr > > 1. > https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/aix/7.2?topic=daemon-pxe-vendor-container-suboptions > 2. https://ipxe.org/buil

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] pxe-service entries in dnsmasq conf seem to fail non-proxy EFI boot

2021-09-27 Thread Shrenik Bhura
urther into the problem area. Best regards, Shrenik On Mon, 27 Sept 2021 at 20:56, Shrenik Bhura wrote: > > Hi Petr, > > The proposed config (also given below) doesn't work in non-proxy mode. I > tested it with a RPi 4B and Intel NUC in non-proxy mode. > > > >

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] pxe-service entries in dnsmasq conf seem to fail non-proxy EFI boot

2021-09-27 Thread Shrenik Bhura
should offer similar paths also on IPv6. Maybe > time would be found sometime to implement also IPv6 support. > > Cheers, > Petr > On 9/25/21 13:14, Shrenik Bhura wrote: > > Hi Geert, > > Your advice doesn't seem to work. Gives an error on the very first line > that

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] pxe-service entries in dnsmasq conf seem to fail non-proxy EFI boot

2021-09-25 Thread Shrenik Bhura
Hi Geert, Your advice doesn't seem to work. Gives an error on the very first line that has been changed. tag:!iPXE,X86PC,ltsp/undionly.kpxe Thanks, Shrenik On Fri, 19 Mar, 2021, 15:54 Geert Stappers via Dnsmasq-discuss, < dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at

[Dnsmasq-discuss] pxe-service entries in dnsmasq conf seem to fail non-proxy EFI boot

2021-03-19 Thread Shrenik Bhura
Hello! Am trying to boot UEFI clients over iPXE via dnsmasq setup in no proxy mode. When pxe-service entries are commented out and dnsmasq restarted, the boot process proceeds fine else the client shows "PXE-E21: Remote boot cancelled" after getting the IP. Related LTSP PR - https://github.com/