On 2023-05-06 23:46, Buck Horn wrote:
On 06.05.2023 20:17:22, "A C" wrote:
One thing I'd like to point out is that the documentation
demonstrating setting a static IP using dhcpcd.conf is not from the
Raspberry Pi foundation but from a lot of other Rasberry Pi blogs onli
m
the ISP/modem but otherwise DHCP should be disabled on anything but the
WAN interface if the router is also your internal DHCP server.
On 2023-05-06 12:00, Johan Vromans wrote:
On Sat, 6 May 2023 11:17:22 -0700, A C wrote:
The official blog does not list using that method at
One thing I'd like to point out is that the documentation demonstrating
setting a static IP using dhcpcd.conf is not from the Raspberry Pi
foundation but from a lot of other Rasberry Pi blogs online.
The official blog does not list using that method at all. Instead it
either points to using a
Thanks to the list for the suggestions, I was indeed able to get the TXT
request working properly. I tried to reply to the list but it appears
that now having DKIM on my domain is blocking messages to the list
(maybe, we'll see if this one goes through) or otherwise the list policy
has gotten
I have dnsmasq on my router set to use my own domain name internally
(let's just call it example.com)
I do have that same domain in a domain provider outside with DNS records.
What I'd like to do is forward outbound queries (meaning from inside my
home network and destined for dnsmasq normally
On 2019-07-01 02:08, Geert Stappers wrote:
> On 01-07-2019 10:41, Nicolas Cavallari wrote:
>
>> On 26/06/2019 22:32, Geert Stappers wrote:
>>> My (educated??) guess is that lease data is stored in Dbus.
>>>
>>> My only point to back that up, is `dnsmasq -v` showing "DBus"
>> D-Bus does not store
On 2019-06-26 22:09, Geert Stappers wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 06:20:32PM -0700, A C wrote:
>> On 2019-06-26 13:32, Geert Stappers wrote:
>>> On 24-06-2019 02:38, A C wrote:
>
>>>>>>> On 23-06-2019 08:06, A C wrote:
>>>>>>
On 2019-06-26 13:32, Geert Stappers wrote:
> On 24-06-2019 02:38, A C wrote:
>
>> On 2019-06-23 11:08, Geert Stappers wrote:
>>> On Sun, Jun 23, 2019 at 09:33:21AM -0700, A C wrote:
>>>> On 2019-06-23 03:32, Geert Stappers wrote:
>>>>> On 23-0
On 2019-06-23 11:08, Geert Stappers wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 23, 2019 at 09:33:21AM -0700, A C wrote:
>> On 2019-06-23 03:32, Geert Stappers wrote:
>>> On 23-06-2019 08:06, A C wrote:
>>>
>>>> I'm having trouble removing leases from my system. I have a
On 2019-06-23 03:32, Geert Stappers wrote:
> On 23-06-2019 08:06, A C wrote:
>
>> I'm having trouble removing leases from my system. I have a client that
>> accepted a lease in my DHCP range before I remembered to put it in
>> /etc/ethers and /etc/hosts to give it a
I'm having trouble removing leases from my system. I have a client that
accepted a lease in my DHCP range before I remembered to put it in
/etc/ethers and /etc/hosts to give it a static lease.
I turned off the client, stopped dnsmasq, removed the lease file entry
in /var/lib/misc/dnsmasq.leases a
If you are thinking of adding an access point then just get an access
point that can handle VLAN per SSID. Several vendors sell them
including Cisco, Avaya, and Ubiquiti. The Ubiquiti is probably least
expensive option and supports up to four SSIDs per radio (so four on 2.4
GHz and another four o
The only other method of exporting an SSID is via 802.1X (RADIUS)
authentication mechanisms which contain the SSID in the authentication
exchange. However, this requires an 802.1X capable access point to
ensure the wireless device stays off the network until the
authentication is complete.
Typica
On 2018-04-21 05:41, john doe wrote:
> On 4/21/2018 10:02 AM, Sean Baughn wrote:
>> Hello. Is it possible to use tags with the address directive? Goal
>> being to
>> specify a name resolution response based on a tag match. Example of my
>> use
>> case:
>>
>> dhcp-mac=set:kids,XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX #My
On 2015-12-02 00:50, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> Hi "A C",
>
> Le Wed, 2 Dec 2015 00:00:06 -0800
> A C a écrit:
>
>>> I infer that what you have in your working config is not
>>>
>>> server=/vpn.example.com/10.0.0.140
>>> loc
On 2015-12-01 23:43, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> Hi "A C",
>
> Le Tue, 1 Dec 2015 22:46:40 -0800
> A C a écrit:
>
>> On 2015-12-01 22:22, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
>>> Hi "A C",
>>>
>>> Cc:ing Simon in case the problem is indeed a
On 2015-12-01 22:22, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> Hi "A C",
>
> Cc:ing Simon in case the problem is indeed a weird dependency of
> "server=" on "local=" -- or to ascertain it doesn't.
>
> Le Tue, 1 Dec 2015 19:53:37 -0800
> A C a écrit:
>
the help, that was a bit of a mystery.
On 2015-12-01 15:40, A C wrote:
> On 2015-12-01 13:22, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
>> Hi "A C",
>>
>> Le Tue, 1 Dec 2015 09:59:07 -0800
>> A C a écrit:
>>
>> (note : local= is synonymous to server=)
>>
>
On 2015-12-01 13:22, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> Hi "A C",
>
> Le Tue, 1 Dec 2015 09:59:07 -0800
> A C a écrit:
>
> (note : local= is synonymous to server=)
>
>> local=/example.com/
>
> This one means *example.com should be resolved by reading /etc/hos
On 2015-12-01 07:46, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> Hi "A C",
>
> Le Mon, 30 Nov 2015 21:34:58 -0800
> A C a écrit:
>
>> On 2015-11-30 05:02, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
>>
>>> Can you watch the router's DNS traffic rather than the VPN server's?
>
On 2015-11-30 05:02, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> Can you watch the router's DNS traffic rather than the VPN server's?
> Possibly give a tcpdump of a successful and a failed DNS request? I
> assume you cannot change how dnsmasq runs on the router but if you can,
> then try having it log the successful
On 2015-11-30 05:02, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> Hello again "A C",
>
> Le Mon, 30 Nov 2015 00:31:28 -0800
> A C a écrit:
>
>> On 2015-11-29 23:49, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
>>> Hi again "A C",
>>>
>>> Le Sun, 29 Nov 2015 23:19:28 -0800
On 2015-11-29 23:49, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> Hi again "A C",
>
> Le Sun, 29 Nov 2015 23:19:28 -0800
> A C a écrit:
>
>> On 2015-11-29 22:50, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
>>> Hi "A C",
>>>
>>> Le Sun, 29 Nov 2015 14:08:50 -0800
>>
On 2015-11-29 22:50, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> Hi "A C",
>
> Le Sun, 29 Nov 2015 14:08:50 -0800
> A C a écrit:
>
>> Ok, this question is for a much older version of dnsmasq because I
>> haven't been able to update the router firmware to bring in a newer
>
Ok, this question is for a much older version of dnsmasq because I
haven't been able to update the router firmware to bring in a newer
version. I'm currently using version 2.35
My current internal IP space is 10.0.0.0/255.255.0.0 (A Class B subnet
of the 10.x.x.x Class A space). I have a VPN se
h
the same results.
>
> On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 03:34, A C wrote:
> > Well, it seems to start up normally. It just never seems to get a DHCP
> > request. There's nothing in the logs after the initial startup messages
> > (like loading /etc/ethers). As soon as
a class C.
> From: rune.k...@gmail.com
> Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 03:00:59 +0200
> Subject: Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] DHCP not working for netmask 255.255.0.0?
> To: ag...@hotmail.com
> CC: dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
>
> On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 02:45, A C wrote:
>
I was trying to stretch out my internal IP space a bit by switching from a
netmask of 255.255.255.0 to 255.255.0.0 so I could divide up services by a
larger subnet (servers on 10.0.0.x, IP phones on 10.0.1.x, etc.). I'm using
dnsmasq on a Linksys WRT54G and have been doing so with no problems
> Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 17:09:39 +
> From: richardvoigt
> Subject: Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Override DNS servers in DHCP packet
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 12:51 AM, A C wrote:
> >> On Tue, 23 Sep 2008 15:45:24 -0400
> >> A C wrote:
> >>
> >> >
> Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 18:02:13 -0400
> From: ch...@pcbi.upenn.edu
> To: ag...@hotmail.com
> CC: dnsmasq-disc...@thekelleys.org.uk
> Subject: Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Override DNS servers in DHCP packet
>
> On Tue, 23 Sep 2008 15:45:24 -0400
> A C wrote:
>
> &
Does dnsmasq use the DNS servers listed in /etc/resolv.conf over those listed
in a DHCP packet? I was forced to use DHCP for my public connection but I
don't want to use the provided DNS servers as they are slower than the ones I
had manually configured.
__
I've got a laptop that uses a wireless or wired connection (never both
simultaneously). Is there a way to configure dnsmasq to serve the same IP and
hostname to the laptop regardless of which interface is used? Currently other
DHCP devices on my network use /etc/ethers to govern which IP they
> Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 21:52:38 -0400
> From: c...@cmpalmer.org
> To: ag...@hotmail.com
> Subject: Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Question about DNS vunlerabiltiy in dnsmasq
> CC: dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
>
> On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 7:30 PM, A C wrote:
> &g
> Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 18:05:27 +0100
> From: si...@thekelleys.org.uk
> To: ag...@hotmail.com
> CC: dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
> Subject: Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Question about DNS vunlerabiltiy in dnsmasq
>
> A C wrote:
> > I'm running dnsmasq 2.3
I'm running dnsmasq 2.35 but it's on an embedded system and the package manager
hasn't created a new version yet. I wanted to know how vulnerable I was to the
recent security alert regarding DNS and whether there's a potential workaround
that I could put in place for now.
Thanks,
Alex
__
I have a mix of *nix and Windows XP hosts behind my router and none are
configured to have FQDNs. The router has all the IPs and hostnames in its
/etc/hosts and the clients have their hosts files blank except for the
typical localhost entry. All the *nix hosts are able to query and resolve
lo
36 matches
Mail list logo
