Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] About resolution performance and adblock

2024-11-25 Thread Ercolino de Spiacico
The amount of resources we have on a router are very limited. That is mainly the reason why we used dnsmasq initially. Wireless drivers keep us jailed to Kernel 2.6 for the time being, and this is also another limitation that could prevent a Pi-hole to be even be considered, as backporting is

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] About resolution performance and adblock

2024-11-25 Thread Buck Horn via Dnsmasq-discuss
Hi Ercolino, On 24.11.24 17:26, Ercolino de Spiacico wrote: (...) Also, Pi-Hole requires additional HW, where FreshTomato runs on a simple router with optional USB storage. pihole-FTL may require more resources to run than plain dnsmasq (mostly memory), but it does not tie to any specific hard