Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] dnsmasq

2024-05-07 Thread Petr Menšík
Hi! Depends on what you mean by full-fledged. The --auth-zone support should be enough for simple things. Of course running BIND9 provides you much more features with better performance under heavy load, but also with much higher resources used. Depends on what are your use cases. For simple

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] NXDOMAIN entries in addn-host file

2024-05-07 Thread Petr Menšík
I think that can be already specified by --server-file. Each domain would be listed as --server=/blocked.example.net/, which implements just --local= option. Of course that requires some decoration around just list of domains. It is not possible to load just domain per line file into dnsmasq.

[Dnsmasq-discuss] NXDOMAIN entries in addn-host file

2024-05-07 Thread Steffen Greber
I know in the addn-host you can specify additional hosts files. It would be great to extend the syntax, so we can block some domains (ipv4 and ipv6). Currently I add some domains with 127.0.0.1 or 0.0.0.0 to blacklist them but it seams not to be really the same than be resolved to NXDOMAIN, since