Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] dhcp-lease-max is only for DHCPv4?

2023-06-02 Thread Linyih Teng
Hello! Thank you for all your help, and sorry for the delay in my response. I have conducted tests based on the opinions of @pemensik and @imnozi, but unfortunately, the same issue continues to occur. >From @imnozi suggestions : - An easy-ish thing to check in the source: is the counter wi

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] dnsmasq 2.89 sometimes segfaults on SIGHUP

2023-06-02 Thread Dominik Derigs via Dnsmasq-discuss
Hey Felix, On Fri, 2023-06-02 at 13:04 +, felix.hillingshaeu...@sony.com wrote: > #7 0x5556ba44 in dhcp_netid_free (nid=0x77e70074) at > option.c:1297 Oh, interesting. This rings a bell. I remember having seen some crashes involving this function some time ago myself, however, i

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] v6 to v4 switch on fail over on Strict Order

2023-06-02 Thread Petr Menšík
If the V6 route is missing, UDP packets sent to v6 hosts would fail immediately. dnsmasq tries to use usually some resolver, which is responding. If v6 timeouts, they should not become such. It tries to send query every 20 seconds or 50 queries to all servers. But in general, it should work fin

[Dnsmasq-discuss] dnsmasq 2.89 sometimes segfaults on SIGHUP

2023-06-02 Thread felix.hillingshaeu...@sony.com
Hi all, I have a dnsmasq running in version 2.89, which sometimes, not always, segfaults on a SIGHUP (reload). This came up while updating dnsmasq from 2.85 to 2.89. The segfault is not reproducible with 2.85, while using the exact same configuration. I dug a bit through the code and debugged w