apt remove --purge dnsmasq* fixed the issue. Thanks a lot.
https://serverfault.com/questions/826872/return-a-records-but-not--records-on-specific-domain-in-bind9/827217#827217
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.u
Thanks!
I were checking it a bit on test build and found part of file
0013-Fix-coverity-issues-detected-in-domain-match.c.patch avoided
application. domain-match.c:447 still has add_resource_record return
value unchecked, unlike A record above.
Btw, return values shadows truncp pointer. If add_re
Hi,
I am submitting patch enabling IDN usage for input parameters. We have
support for IDN, but because locale is not properly initialized, no
parameters using special characters are accepted.
Patch #1 adds domain_len to more places, quite similar to struct server
and struct serv_local. It comput
On 9/30/21 09:42, john doe wrote:
> On 9/30/2021 7:17 AM, Geert Stappers via Dnsmasq-discuss wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 09:15:15PM -0700, E wrote:
IPv6 connectivity
>>>
>>> Why dnsmasq can't drop ,
>>> when the server has no IPv6 connectivity at all?
>>> This doesn't make sense.
I h
Okay, confirming this works on 2.86 release, but does not with 2.85 or
2.81. I am afraid it could be requested via bugs reported to
distribution only. It does not work with root domain /./ on previous
versions.
It seems --address=/./:: is now equivalent to --address=/#/::
What seems more importan
> 1. seems to have wrong pcap file or it does not use configuration
attached in linked archive. It seems it offers menu items from 2. archive
with custom pxe-services.
Apologies, there was definitely some mistake.
We have applied the patch and tried with and without dhcp-no-override but
it still
On 9/30/2021 7:17 AM, Geert Stappers via Dnsmasq-discuss wrote:
On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 09:15:15PM -0700, E wrote:
IPv6 connectivity
Why dnsmasq can't drop ,
when the server has no IPv6 connectivity at all?
This doesn't make sense.
No sense to those would don't understand what DNS is.
(D
