This extends query filtering support beyond what is currently possible
with the `--ipset` configuration option, by adding support for:
1) Specifying allowlists on a per-client basis, based on their
associated Linux connection track mark.
2) Dynamic configuration of allowlists via Ubus.
3) Report
I reviewed this commit:
commit 1c9f136b57456278ad7aae62b8bae01f01383e1c
Author: Simon Kelley
Date: Tue Jun 15 22:07:59 2021 +0100
Man page update, lease times can be given in days or weeks.
And found the structure 'server_addr4*' was casted from to 'server*'
// domain-match.c
/* servers need
On 15/06/2021 22:19, Matthias Bodenbinder wrote:
> Am Dienstag, dem 15.06.2021 um 16:29 +0100 schrieb Simon Kelley:
>> On 08/06/2021 10:05, Matthias Bodenbinder via Dnsmasq-discuss wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I have a question about the notracking blocklists in combination with
>>> dnsmasq. I have a
Tacking this onto the end of the thread, rather than replying
specifically to the last post.
Apologies, I've not been reading this: If I keep up with my email, I
have too little time to program, so every so often I do programming and
ignore email. This coding ended up taking a long time, and resul
Hi,
interesting problem. If you want to be able to resolve mDNS .local on
network 46, I doubt that can be archieved using dnsmasq directly.
.local domain is for multicast resolution on local network. That means
rpi machines are on different local network than newton. local domain
should not be us
Am Dienstag, dem 15.06.2021 um 16:29 +0100 schrieb Simon Kelley:
> On 08/06/2021 10:05, Matthias Bodenbinder via Dnsmasq-discuss wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I have a question about the notracking blocklists in combination with
> > dnsmasq. I have already created an
> > issue on the notracking
> > i
On 02/06/2021 09:18, Christian Ehrhardt wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 4:28 PM Christian Ehrhardt
> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 8:57 AM Christian Ehrhardt
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>> since nothing happened on this topic (e.g. committed to git / further
>>> discussion) I wondered if you w
On 08/06/2021 10:05, Matthias Bodenbinder via Dnsmasq-discuss wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a question about the notracking blocklists in combination with
> dnsmasq. I have already created an issue on the notracking
> issue tracker but did not receive an answer yet:
> https://github.com/notracking/
Hi Eduardo,
can you rebase it to master branch?
Do you have any readme or summary, how that feature would be used?
My first note is it adds HAVE_UBUS define to lease structure, but it
seems more or less unrelated to ubus itself. I could imagine similar
mechanism might be interesting also for d-b
