On 5/4/21 4:00 PM, Petr Menšík wrote:
[...] With some hierarchy, it could reduce number of entries compared. Binary
tree implementation still might be better, but harder to implement well.
why is that? btree libraries have been around for decades and should be easy
enough to add and use... we us
This extends query filtering support beyond what is currently possible
with the `--ipset` configuration option, by adding support for:
1) Specifying allowlists on a per-client basis, based on their
associated Linux connection track mark.
2) Dynamic configuration of allowlists via Ubus.
3) Report
Hi,
wrote some ideas I had about it.
On 5/3/21 6:49 PM, Simon Kelley wrote:
> This is just to mark that I have spent the afternoon thinking about
> this, and I'm in the process of a rather larger re-factor of the code.
>
> The aim of this is to cover the points Petr makes below, but
> additional
On 04.05.21 18:17, Ercolino de Spiacico wrote:
1) why doesn't dnsmasq perform reverse DNS resolution by default? All
the info is in there but it seems like additional directives are
needed.
what do you mean? dnsmasq resoves everything it can, but only if you ask for
it.
2) Talking about havin
I would like to ask two questions on dnsmasq name resolution:
1) why doesn't dnsmasq perform reverse DNS resolution by default? All
the info is in there but it seems like additional directives are needed.
2) Talking about having an external file where reverse lookup info is
held, how would th
> On 3 May 2021, at 17:49, Simon Kelley wrote:
>
> This is just to mark that I have spent the afternoon thinking about
> this, and I'm in the process of a rather larger re-factor of the code.
Can’t wait to test it ‘cos the description sounds great - thanks for the update.
Cheers,
Kevin D-B
