I don't think that doing bug work-around behavior automagically is a
good idea. If it is required to do non-standard stuff, that should be
explicit.
The difference between Michael's patch and Jarek's seems to be that
Michael's works automatically when there is precisely one valid boot
service line
On Sun, May 8, 2016 at 3:41 PM, wrote:
> how about going the other way... reverse the logic so that those two are
> skipped all the time... then only if they are needed, add an option to
> enable them...
>
> pxe-add-menu=X86-64_EFI
> pxe-add-menu=BC_EFI
>
Yeah that is not an unwelcome sugges
On 05/08/2016 06:52 AM, Dreamcat4 wrote:
But it is bad for each UEFI pc users going forwards to know to need to
manually specify:
pxe-skip-menu=X86-64_EFI
pxe-skip-menu=BC_EFI
Every time around. Because that is nearly everybody going forwards. How to
solve? Can we then make the option logic wor
On Sat, May 7, 2016 at 9:49 PM, Simon Kelley
wrote:
> On 06/05/16 12:58, Jaroslaw Polok wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > On 06/05/16 12:40, Dreamcat4 wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Perhaps later down the line (once more people get onboard and can start
> >> using it), then this pxe UEFI mode can be improved even furt
