-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
I think the problem may be the code-path in get_new_frec() which frees
old frecs. Warping the time will make all the records suddenly old,
and they'll get freed by the loop. The problem is that some will be
freed by the recursive calls to free_frec w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Why do you think that this is BOOTP related? I can't see any evidence
that your clients are sending bootp requests.
Background: BOOTP is an old protocol that pre-dates DHCP. DHCP packets
are actually BOOTP packets with lots of extra options. From th
Hi,
Any feedback here?
Thanks,
Thomas
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 12:16 PM, Thomas Ballantyne
wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> Seeing an issue where BOOTP messages are crashing dnsmasq. dnsmasq exits
> with a SIGTERM.
>
> I tried adding
>
> dhcp-ignore=bootp
>
>
> to dnsmasq.more.conf but that did not solve
Hi,
I just noticed a crash on my mips based openwrt router.
It looks like it's because of the initial time change on boot, this
device doesn't have a RTC and the time is set using ntp.
I dunno how reproducible this is, maybe it happend before and I just
didn't notice.
Mon Dec 7 17:05:27 2015 dae
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 07/12/15 04:39, Shane Manjarres wrote:
> Looking at the build options listed in /src/config.h it states the
> following:
>
> The default set of options to build
>
> HAVE_DHCP HAVE_DHCP6 HAVE_TFTP HAVE_SCRIPT HAVE_AUTH HAVE_IPSET
> HAVE_LOOP
When I built dnsmasq 2.75 in FreeBSD 10.2 some warnings were produced during
make. Not sure if they warnings are issues that need to be addressed. But just
in case I'm attaching the entire build process output.
root@freebsd:~/Desktop/dnsmasq-2.75 # make
cc -Wall -W -O2 -DVERSION='"2.75"'
On 07/12/15 04:39, Shane Manjarres wrote:
> Looking at the build options listed in /src/config.h it states the
> following:
>
> *The default set of options to build*
>
> HAVE_DHCP
> HAVE_DHCP6
> HAVE_TFTP
> HAVE_SCRIPT
> HAVE_AUTH
> HAVE_IPSET
> HAVE_LOOP
>
> *In the same config.h file is s
On Wed, Nov 18, Olaf Hering wrote:
> I wonder why the example in the host-record= lists both?
Any answer to that question?
Olaf
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dn
