I was under the impression that:
(1) This information is already available to the lease script
(2) The leasefile database format is locked down for backwards
compatibility.
But maybe Simon can find a way to make it work.
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 4:17 PM, David Bird wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> Firs
Greetings,
First of all, thanks for the great project! It's is incredibly versatile
and flexible. Please find the attached patch for your consideration. In
our use of dnsmasq, it is important to know on which interface of
several a lease was issued. The patch adds the interface name to the
leases
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 09:42:34PM +, Ed W wrote:
> On 13/11/2012 15:03, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> >And dhcpcd(8) is writing domain_name_servers to
> >/var/lib/dhcpcd/resolv.conf.
>
> How do you remove servers from that file when the link goes down?
Why would I care? If I have no connection, nothing
On 13/11/2012 15:03, /dev/rob0 wrote:
And dhcpcd(8) is writing domain_name_servers to
/var/lib/dhcpcd/resolv.conf.
How do you remove servers from that file when the link goes down? What
if two connections try to add the same entries and then one of them goes
down?
Ed
_
On 13/11/12 19:49, Jeff Ferland wrote:
I did some source code surfing on thew way to work this morning to
figure out why before receiving your message. It also appears that
setting ra-stateless in the place of slaac worked. What I'd
particularly like is to run the DHCP option with the router itse
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 09:03:03AM -0600, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 12:13:07PM +0100, s...@sltosis.org wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 06:11:43PM -0600, richardvo...@gmail.com
> > wrote:
> > > On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 5:05 PM, /dev/rob0
> > > wrote:
> > > > > On 10/11/2012 15:
On 13/11/12 00:31, Jeff Ferland wrote:
> The following command doesn't seem to bring up the ff02:1:2 address to
> respond to requests. Router advertisements are sent, but no client or ping
> requests are acknowledged.
>
> Any thoughts or minimum configuration options that I'm missing?
>
> sudo
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 12:13:07PM +0100, s...@sltosis.org wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 06:11:43PM -0600, richardvo...@gmail.com
> wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 5:05 PM, /dev/rob0
> > wrote:
> > > > On 10/11/2012 15:54, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> > > > >Seems to me that dnsmasq is a better nscd
Re: Setting netmask via /etc/ethers
In our case, subnets are defined dynamically and we already
use /etc/ethers to set IP addresses. I suppose the alternative would be
something like rewriting a --conf-file with the current subnet
definitions. However, dnsmasq doesn't reread these files on a SIGHU
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 06:11:43PM -0600, richardvo...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 5:05 PM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
>
> > > On 10/11/2012 15:54, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> > > >Seems to me that dnsmasq is a better nscd replacement, and
> > > >it has a place in mobile computing.
> > > >
> > > ># we
10 matches
Mail list logo
