[Dnsmasq-discuss] ff02:1:2 not being brought up

2012-11-12 Thread Jeff Ferland
The following command doesn't seem to bring up the ff02:1:2 address to respond to requests. Router advertisements are sent, but no client or ping requests are acknowledged. Any thoughts or minimum configuration options that I'm missing? sudo dnsmasq -F 2000:3000:4000:abc::,slaac -d -p 0 -O opt

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] dnsmasq for road warriors

2012-11-12 Thread richardvo...@gmail.com
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 5:05 PM, /dev/rob0 wrote: > > On 10/11/2012 15:54, /dev/rob0 wrote: > > >Seems to me that dnsmasq is a better nscd replacement, and > > >it has a place in mobile computing. > > > > > ># we use this dnsmasq as this system's own resolver > > >no-resolv > > On Sat, Nov 10, 20

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] dnsmasq for road warriors

2012-11-12 Thread Ed W
On 11/11/2012 23:05, /dev/rob0 wrote: Nothing wrong with dhcp hooks. Setup things as advanced as you need. Dnsmasq regularly sends *all* requests to *all* nameservers and picks the fastest responding. So it will choose a faster responding server where there are several options This goes again

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] dnsmasq for road warriors

2012-11-12 Thread Ed W
On 11/11/2012 23:05, /dev/rob0 wrote: On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 08:34:38PM +, Ed W wrote: Try: http://roy.marples.name/projects/openresolv Eww, no. That's a kludge, and again, it totally misses the point of this dnsmasq instance exclusively providing DNS to local processes. This was bro

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Setting netmask via /etc/ethers

2012-11-12 Thread Simon Kelley
On 11/11/12 11:26, Eldon Ziegler wrote: > We use /etc/ethers to set IP addresses dynamically. Is there a way to > set the netmask along with the IP address? If not, I would like to > request an upgrade. > Hmm, netmask is a per-subnet parameter, rather than a per-host one. It doesn't normally make